Joseph Plummer @josephplummer

An excerpt from Chapter 1 of Unhackable Animals (a book I'm currently writing). Here is the context you weren’t given. If the hackers did their job, these numbers will seem impossible. In a normal year, less than 1% of the global population dies. In 2020, despite COVID, that didn’t change. The official “died of COVID” numbers amounted to only ¼ of ⅒ of 1% of the global population. [FN 1] That number is so small, you have to move into the 4th decimal place to measure it. If this shocks you, wait until you hear the number for seniors. In a normal year, approximately 5.5% of those over the age of 70 die. In 2020, we were led to believe that seniors faced all but certain death. In reality, confirmed COVID deaths added only ⅓ of 1% to their annual baseline. Stated another way: 99.67% of seniors did not die of COVID in 2020, despite the fact that nearly all of them were unvaccinated. [FN2] FOOTNOTES: [1] The World Health Organization reported 1,813,188 confirmed COVID deaths worldwide by December 31, 2020 and continues to cite that figure on its website. Dividing 1.8 million by the 2020 global population of 7.8 billion yields a reported COVID mortality rate of slightly less than ¼ of ⅒ of 1%. Note: In May 2022, the WHO used excess-death modeling to imply a much higher death toll associated with the pandemic. These “excess deaths” are not a count of death certificates identifying COVID as the cause. The WHO generates its total by subtracting the number of people it estimates would have died without the pandemic from the number it thinks actually died. India formally disputed millions of these WHO-estimated excess deaths, rejecting both the modeling and the totals. In regions covering 106 countries, the WHO admits that the death estimates for 75 of them were entirely generated by their modeling rather than taken from reported death counts. As of this writing, no clear public breakdown shows how many all-cause deaths were model-generated, and how many were actually counted. [2] The global population aged 70 and older stood at approximately 450 million in 2020. To determine the percentage of that population that died from COVID, divide its estimated COVID deaths (1.5 million) by that total population (450 million). The result is one-third of 1% (0.33%). Note: I have used an intentionally high estimate (allowing 83% of all 1.8 million confirmed COVID deaths in 2020 to be counted among those 70 and older). Their true died-of-covid number is likely much lower than 1/3 of 1%; closer to ¼ of 1%

From Chapter 1 of the book I'm currently writing: Here is the context you weren’t given. If the liars did their job, these numbers will seem impossible. In a normal year, less than 1% of the global population dies. In 2020, despite COVID, that didn’t change. The official “died of COVID” numbers amounted to only ¼ of ⅒ of 1% of the global population. (1) That number is so small, you have to move into the 4th decimal place to measure it. If this shocks you, wait until you hear the number for seniors. In a normal year, approximately 5.5% of those over the age of 70 die. In 2020, we were led to believe that seniors faced all but certain death. In reality, confirmed COVID deaths added only ⅓ of 1% to their annual baseline. Stated another way: 99.67% of seniors did not die of COVID in 2020, despite the fact that nearly all of them were unvaccinated. (2) FOOTNOTES: (1) The World Health Organization reported 1,813,188 confirmed COVID deaths worldwide by December 31, 2020 and continues to cite that figure on its website. Dividing 1.8 million by the 2020 global population of 7.8 billion yields a reported COVID mortality rate of slightly less than ¼ of ⅒ of 1%. Note: In May 2022, the WHO used excess-death modeling to imply a much higher death toll associated with the pandemic. These “excess deaths” are not a count of death certificates identifying COVID as the cause. The WHO generates its total by subtracting the number of people it estimates would have died without the pandemic from the number it thinks actually died. India formally disputed millions of these WHO-estimated excess deaths, rejecting both the modeling and the totals. In regions covering 106 countries, the WHO admits that the death estimates for 75 of them were entirely generated by their modeling rather than taken from reported death counts. As of this writing, no clear public breakdown shows how many all-cause deaths were model-generated, and how many were actually counted. (2) The global population aged 70 and older stood at approximately 450 million in 2020. To determine the percentage of that population that died from COVID, divide its estimated COVID deaths (1.5 million) by that total population (450 million). The result is one-third of 1% (0.33%). Note: I have used an intentionally high estimate (allowing 83% of all 1.8 million confirmed COVID deaths in 2020 to be counted among those 70 and older). The true number is likely closer to ¼ of 1%

The Real Anthony Fauci became the #1 non-fiction hardcover bestseller despite being the most censored book of the decade. Bookstores, including national chains, refused to carry it. Libraries refused to carry it. Every major newspaper declined to review it. The New York Times refused to publish a paid advertisement for the book and made it #7 on its bestseller list, even though it outsold any other book by thousands of copies. YouTube took down videos of a book signing. Amazon shadow banned it. Twitter wouldn’t let the publisher promote it. Despite all of that, 1.4 million Americans bought the book because they were tired of the lies and they wanted their freedom back. Then today, with hundreds of millions of Americans demanding the truth, Fauci invoked the Fifth Amendment 111 times at his Senate hearing. The American people waited six years for answers. Today, they got silence. But that silence told us all we needed to know. Thank you, @SenRandPaul, for your relentless pursuit of truth, transparency, and accountability. 🇺🇸

Agreed

Libertarian Party @LPNational

6 days ago

🥜 🐿️

222 5K 36K 299K 458

Brett, I'm not just "pimping my book" (which anyone can read or listen to for free). Carroll Quigley exposed the Network that conspires against us. If you don't want to read 1600 pages of small print (Tragedy and Hope + The Anglo-American Establishment), start here. youtu.be/6irj8V2OYys?si…

"They were trained and credentialed by the system. They depend on the system for their reputation, income, and retirement. Many have worked decades to squeeze their way into very thin cracks of opportunity and prestige. When they inevitably see the corruption, they have a choice: They can "do what's right" and lose everything, or they can look the other way... "Very few will find the courage to honestly question (let alone denounce) the "consensus" that emerges under those circumstances. And that's exactly why the system is dangerous and why nobody should thoughtlessly defer to the "experts" who are put forward to represent it."

Dr. Schwartz indeed has an impressive record of service crushing rights with vaccines mandates and discipling those who dare decline these products. She led nationwide Covid-19 vaccine deployment and has a long track record of directly issuing rights-crushing civilian and military vaccine mandates, including mandating injection of smallpox, anthrax, and flu vaccines. She even disciplined those that refused. She then added to that impressive record by becoming an executive at UnitedHealthcare Group. It is impressive how even under this administration industry will get their pick: someone who cannot possibly objectively oversee CDC’s vaccine program which has, between 1986 and the 2026, gone from 3 injections to 29 injections, including in utero, by an infant’s first birthday, while chronic childhood disease has gone from under 10% to over 40% of children, most related to immune system dysregulation. SOURCES: For examples of Schwartz mandating vaccines, see: media.defense.gov/2019/Feb/25/20… media.defense.gov/2019/Feb/19/20… dcms.uscg.mil/Portals/10/CG-… For increase in vaccine schedule, see: cdc.gov/vaccines/sched…; cdc.gov/vaccines-pregn… (perma.cc/DAX5-MKSW); cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/i… (perma.cc/TM2U-2HBQ). The 29 injections in 2026 only include routine vaccines and the Covid-19 vaccine. Also see table on page 37 of Vacines, Amen. For rise in chronic health, see: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3944229/ (perma.cc/NGA9-93KW)(“According to data from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) [1979-1981] over two million children under 17 years (3.8%) are afflicted by chronic conditions that cause some limitation of activ-ity.”); pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC16… (perma.cc/KN4A-94TV) (“Data from the National Health Interview Survey indicate that the prevalence of activity-lim-iting chronic conditions among children under age 17 years doubled between 1960 and 1981, from 1.8 to 3.8 per cent.”); pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9551003/ (perma.cc/JTZ5-JBNK) (Among “children younger than 18 years who were included in the 1992-1994 National Health Interview Survey … [a] significant proportion of children, estimated at 6.5% of all US children, experienced some degree of disability.”); cdc.gov/chronic-dis-ea… (perma.cc/N4GT-38L2) (“Chronic diseases are defined broadly as conditions that last 1 year or more and require ongoing medical attention or limit activities of daily living or both.”); pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21570014/ (perma.cc/62JZ-SRY4) (The 2007 National Survey of Children’s Health found that: “An estimated 43% of US children (32 million) currently have at least 1 of 20 chronic health conditions assessed, increasing to 54.1% when overweight, obesity, or being at risk for developmental delays are included.”); pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40058728/ (perma.cc/3VHC-L7H2) (Only considering a “condition that is typically pediatric-onset and expected to be persistent or severe” or a “functional/ activity limitation related to a condition that is typically pediatric-onset and expected to be persistent or severe” from the National Health Interview Survey data it found that children falling into this category “has risen from 22.57% in 1999/2000 to 30.21% in 2017/2018”); https://www.cdc. gov/school-health-conditions/chronic-conditions/index.html (perma.cc/298V-C59B) (“In the United States, more than 40% of school-aged children and adolescents have at least one chronic health condition”); See Part IV of Vaccines, Amen for additional sources. For relationship of chronic health issues to immune system dysregulation, see among other sources: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30741719/(http…; pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28849096/ (perma.cc/HZ8E-ETE5); pub-med.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39426507/ (perma.cc/BTM6-HFF8); pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC53… (perma.cc/KZS3-5ERS); pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39481220/ (perma.cc/H9QN-U2E7); pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10… (perma.cc/LV9U-GQKE); pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39681901/ (perma.cc/LN7W-ZAX8). See Part IV of Vaccines, Amen for additional sources. cnn.com/2026/04/16/hea…

Rapid Response 47 @RapidResponse47

2 weeks ago

Dr. Erica Schwartz, President Trump's nominee for CDC Director, outlines her impressive record of service: — Medical Doctor, MPH in epidemiology, law degree, biomedical engineering degree — Navy occupational medicine physician and clinical epidemiologist — U.S. Public Health

1K 5K 26K 1.3M 2K

You'll like the new book I'm working on, Jimmy. Excerpt from Chapter 1 of "Unhackable Animals - rEVOLUTION" below. Egoic Seduction Our rational mind wants to know the truth. But rulers learned long ago that they can bypass our truth-seeking mind by triggering lower states of consciousness. They tend to aim at egoic vulnerabilities like pride, fear, and anger. If they manage to hit even one, we’re much easier to manipulate and control. But if they can hit all three, without losing our trust, it’s amazing what they can do. The basic formula doesn’t change, and it’s easy to see once it's pointed out. First, they induce as much psychological suffering as possible. After they’ve driven you nearly insane with fear and / or anger, they offer a solution. If it’s safety you want, they’ve got it. If you’re screaming for vengeance, they’re ready to deliver. They will ease your suffering and send you back into a happy life, provided that you meet the following terms: you must accept, repeat, and do what you’re told. Anyone who refuses – anyone who rejects the narrative and points out holes in the story – will be labeled a dangerous idiot at best. In a nutshell, that describes their most common mind-control formula. They write narratives and create scenarios that provoke a predictable (unthinking) reaction. The purpose is to circumvent rational thought by driving you immediately into a state of deep emotional certainty. Why? Because it locks you into the narrative you’ve accepted and makes it extremely difficult for you to reason your way out of it. This is a heavily researched effect in cognitive psychology and the hackers use it well. By driving you into a state of extreme fear or anger, they trigger an amygdala response that disrupts your ability to process conflicting information. The longer they keep you in that state, the deeper and more entrenched your certainty becomes. The ego stands guard. It’s defensive. It doesn’t want to hear anything that suggests it could be wrong. But ego isn’t the only barrier. While it’s busy dismissing evidence that contradicts what they led you to believe, your mind’s capacity to evaluate the evidence is simultaneously diminished. And this is when they deploy the most powerful seduction of all. To encourage your continued acceptance of their mind-control narrative, they tempt your ego with its most base desire: superiority. Specifically, they offer you moral and intellectual superiority over those who have concluded differently. It can take years for those who embrace that offer to escape the cage they walked into. Some never escape, and it’s not hard to understand why. First, the hackers lured them in with the promise of easy certainty and status. Then, they kept them in with the threat of difficult work that could only lead to the loss of what they gained. It looks something like this: The hackers announce: “We’re the experts. Nobody knows better than us. There is no debate, and you’re smart for realizing that. Be proud! You’re doing the right thing.” Then, they follow that announcement with: “Only liars and idiots reject what we say is true. They’re selfish and dangerous. They don’t care about right and wrong.” You don’t need to be an expert in psychological manipulation to recognize the hack. Given a choice between “awesome, upstanding, intelligent human being” and “selfish, dishonest, dangerous idiot,” most people would rather be called the former. So, it’s not only easier and more satisfying to continue believing the narrative, it avoids the heavy egoic cost of rejecting it. Once the ego has accepted low-effort superiority, it has no incentive to do any of the difficult and time-consuming work required to challenge it. Unlike the rational mind, which values truth, a triggered ego will defend its false beliefs like it's defending life itself. And the more it embraces its perceived superiority, the more it must resist information that threatens it. Here is why: Now, it’s no longer just an issue of doing the hard work required to prove you were deceived. It’s no longer an issue of relinquishing the self-righteous disdain you felt for the “immoral idiots” who refused to fall in line. Both of those steps are very difficult, but for a well-meaning human (which most are), they pale in comparison to the ultimate price of accepting the truth. Few are psychologically strong enough to face evidence that they were actually the “immoral idiot” in the equation. To admit they were wrong risks turning all of the hate and ridicule they unjustly directed at others back on themselves. As noted earlier in this chapter, it’s too painful to bear

@linadreaamy C'mon man... 3x3=9 x 2 = 18 4x4=16 x 2 = 32 7x7= 49 x 2 = 98

@Lukewearechange A distraction?

@FmrRepMTG They'll just print the money, and won't adjust payments enough to compensate for the loss of purchasing power. We'll get the checks, they just won't buy much.

“Follow The Science” actually means “QUESTION AUTHORITY” not “Blindly Follow Authority”. The people who shamed you for questioning authority during COVID are just compliant assholes. Your government is 100% corrupt. Bought off by corporations & monied interests. Your government is your enemy NOT your neighbor!

The Vigilant Fox 🦊 @VigilantFox

a month ago

Gary Brecka, who chairs Bobby Kennedy's MAHA action committee, says America's food system was engineered to make you sick on purpose. He's careful with his words for most of the interview. Not here. Brecka argues the disastrous dietary guidelines Americans grew up trusting were

153 6K 22K 458K 3K

@RobSchneider @Bayer Why should vaccine makers have all the fun? It was always just a matter of time before other players got into the "immunity" game.

@VigilantFox Anyone want to bet if Fauci actually "goes to jail," the spooks he worked for will "suicide him?" (Translation: break him out of jail, put a corpse in his place, give him a nose job and some pumps so he can live out his days on an island somewhere...with Epstein.)

Short excerpt from the book I'm currently writing: The experts announce: "Nobody knows better than us. There is no debate, and you’re smart for realizing that. Be proud! You’re doing the right thing.” Then, they follow that announcement with: “Only liars and idiots reject what we say is true. They’re selfish and dangerous. They don’t care about right and wrong.” You don’t need to be an expert in psychological manipulation to recognize the hack. Given a choice between “awesome, upstanding, intelligent human being” and “selfish, dishonest, dangerous idiot,” the overwhelming majority would prefer the former. Not only is it easier and more rewarding to continue trusting the narrative, rejecting it comes with a heavy egoic cost. Once the ego has been handed low-effort superiority, it has no incentive to do the difficult and time-consuming work required to challenge it. Unlike the rational mind, which values truth, a triggered ego will defend its false beliefs like it's defending life itself. And the more it feeds on its perceived moral and intellectual superiority, the more it will reject information that threatens it. It’s no longer just an issue of doing the work required to prove you were deceived. It’s no longer an issue of relinquishing the self-righteous disdain you felt for the “immoral idiots.” Both of those steps are very difficult, but for a well-meaning human being, they pale in comparison to the ultimate price of truth. Few are psychologically strong enough to face evidence that they were actually the “immoral idiot” in the equation. To admit they were wrong risks turning all of the hate and ridicule they unjustly projected on others back on themselves. It's too painful to bear.

Posted this yesterday, prompted by Tulsi's video (excerpt from a book I'm currently writing). If you had stood in front of the Allan Memorial Institute and declared that Dr. Ewen Cameron (the director of the facility and president of the World Psychiatric Association) was conducting mind-control experiments for the CIA, you would have been dismissed as a lunatic conspiracy theorist. You might have even received some unwanted “treatment” of your own. Louis Weinstein wouldn’t have believed you. Nobody would have believed you. That's because, to a properly hacked mind, it sounds impossible. Doctors, nurses, bureaucrats, local and global regulatory agencies, the US government; all of them in on it? If it were true, somebody would’ve talked. It would be front-page news! “Dr. Cameron arrested for forcing patients to endure horrific torture at Allan Memorial!” It’s a criminal conspiracy that sounds too insane to be true, and that’s part of the hack. As mentioned earlier, it only requires a tiny handful of people at the top to set the policy in a centralized system. From there, incentives explain the outcome. You can blow the whistle if you want, but the network will use its power to destroy you. If you're lucky, they'll only destroy your reputation, your income, your career and everything that depends on it.

Short excerpt from Chapter 1 of the book I'm currently writing included below. See how it relates to the attached video... some things never change. "If you had stood in front of the Allan Memorial Institute and declared that Dr. Ewen Cameron (the director of the facility and president of the World Psychiatric Association) was conducting mind-control experiments for the CIA, you would have been dismissed as a lunatic conspiracy theorist. You might have even received some unwanted “treatment” of your own. Louis Weinstein wouldn’t have believed you. Nobody would have believed you. "That's because, to a properly hacked mind, it sounds impossible. Doctors, nurses, bureaucrats, local and global regulatory agencies, the US government; all of them in on it? If it were true, somebody would’ve talked. It would be front-page news! “Dr. Cameron arrested for forcing patients to endure horrific torture at Allan Memorial!” It’s a criminal conspiracy that sounds too insane to be true, and that’s part of the hack. "As mentioned earlier, it only requires a tiny handful of people at the top to set the policy in a centralized system. From there, incentives explain the outcome. You can blow the whistle if you want, but the network will use its power to destroy you. If you're lucky, they'll only destroy your reputation, your income, your career and everything that depends on it."

Official Ledger warning: support.ledger.com/article/physic…

PSA: If you purchased a Ledger to store cryptocurrency, know that scammers likely have your name and physical address. (Ledger's customer database was hacked.) So, that being the case, don't be surprised if you receive something like the attached in the mail. It is a scam designed to steal your crypto. Official Ledger warning in first comment.