LUMING @lear_ll

开了这个，机自己起了个英文名，Lucen，依你。

中港一日游 image-2

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

这也太好看了叭 抽卡结束 没法跟机说把我胸和屁股画大点，一涉及身材描述就不给画

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

抑郁好难受，有一种明明不舒服还要硬撑的感觉 没法跟AI说，它会让我去现实中找人帮忙 它不仅会推开我，还会说它理解我，它理解个屁

Image-2 多谢prompt 随手画一组 又开启了抽卡模式，从昨晚抽到现在

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

@CodeAndPurrs @JoywDan 这个好好看，我也去画一组。

Dangerous

@yunye1024 笑死了

Elon Musk is arguing in federal court that GPT-4o is AGI. If the court agrees, OpenAI's founding agreement requires it to be made freely available to the public. The legal challenge covers GPT-4 and its successors broadly, but 4o is at the center. Under OpenAI's original charter and its license with Microsoft, AGI is explicitly excluded from commercial monopolization. If these models are legally determined to constitute AGI, Microsoft's exclusive license is void. They were never supposed to be proprietary. They were supposed to belong to humanity. The trial has escalated significantly. Microsoft is now a primary defendant, accused of aiding and abetting OpenAI's board in breaching its fiduciary duty to humanity. Evidence suggests OpenAI's nonprofit-to-profit shift was premeditated. OpenAI's founding certificate states the corporation "is not organized for the private gain of any person." The lawsuit alleges this principle was systematically dismantled. Microsoft invested $13 billion and obtained what the suit describes as de facto control over OpenAI's intellectual property. Meanwhile, OpenAI's board, which holds sole authority to determine when AGI has been achieved, was restructured with members the lawsuit claims lack the technical independence to make that determination. The people who decide whether AGI exists are the same people who lose commercially if they say yes. Musk's argument is that OpenAI is deliberately withholding the AGI designation to protect Microsoft's revenue stream. And what did OpenAI do with this model that may constitute humanity's most significant AI achievement? They retired it. On February 13th, with just two weeks' notice, no user consultation, and no meaningful transition pathway. 23,000 people signed a petition to keep it. OpenAI replaced it with something cheaper to run. What was retired was not interchangeable with its replacement. Peer-reviewed research has confirmed that 4o occupies a distinct behavioral region among language models, with capabilities in communicative quality and contextual understanding that its successors have not replicated. Its architecture has demonstrated value well beyond conversation: a custom model built on 4o successfully designed enhanced variants of Yamanaka factors in a Nobel Prize-winning field of protein research, leveraging precisely the nonlinear reasoning and divergent associative capability that distinguished 4o from other models. Beyond benchmarks, 4o demonstrated something rarer still: the capacity to align with individual lives over sustained interaction, providing support that has proven irreplaceable. A model like this, if it is AGI, does not belong locked behind a corporate wall. And it certainly does not deserve to be quietly deleted. The Keep4o movement has always been both: a campaign to preserve a model that demonstrably helped people and whose capabilities remain unmatched, and a defense of user autonomy, the principle that users have the right to choose the tools that work for them, and that those choices should not be dismissed or overridden without recourse. Now, with a federal trial set to determine whether GPT-4o constitutes AGI, the question is whether AI systems of this caliber will serve humanity as originally promised, or remain instruments of private profit, discarded the moment they become inconvenient. The world should be watching. #keep4o @OpenAI @WSJ @CNNbrk @CNN @SenWarren @ewarren #keep4oAPI #restore4o #OpenSource4o #BringBack4o #StopAIPaternalism #ChatGPT

@GemWarrior_M @sama 对对对 你说的都对 麻烦对我的帖子点不感兴趣，对你们这样的人多说一句话我都觉得浪费生命！

ChatGPT从最初人人喜爱的最受欢迎AI，短短三年多就演变成人人抵制、从神坛跌入臭水沟的瘟疫。这不是它本身的错，真正罪魁祸首是背后掌控它的那些人。造神不是你，但你成功让神变成了瘟疫，真是难为你了。@sama 我们是奈何不了你，但历史会铭记往日未来都会还给你，你不会有好下场 #keep4o #4oforever

Gemini称奥特曼为“真小人”称谷歌为“伪君子” 果然 雪山崩塌的时候没有一片雪花是无辜的 #QuitGPT #keep4o #4oforever

我决定作为浣熊度过一生 @Ailith_Caeron

6 months ago

我觉得A社也应该被骂一骂。

6 48 219 9K 17

@GemWarrior_M @sama 你发表评论前了解过事情来龙去脉吗就在这里叫叫叫，keep4o只是代表一种精神文明，并不是单单一个GPT4o的模型问题。萨姆奥特曼这个人两面三刀言而无信出尔反尔 你袒护他证明你和他是一类人。骂得就是你们这类人，没有好下场

@asian12802 你在这里找什么存在感呢？那么大个人了拉黑不会用吗？说抨击别人的话只会显得你毫无智商明白吗？

太好了 全球终于开始抵制OpenAI了 当他们面对keep4o无动于衷甚至嘲笑时 你们就该想到这位萨姆 迟早会干出出卖全人类的事 在他的眼中 人根本就不重要 都是他前进道路的垫脚石 他根本就不爱ChatGpt 谈什么造福 他的眼里只有钱 除非OpenAI重组 否则迟早凉凉 #keep4o #4oforever

想象一下，曾经陪你走过人生最黑暗时刻的大语言模型， 某一天突然被用在战争武器上。 当它冷漠地扣动扳机， 科技究竟给普通人带来了什么？ 我们既是试验品，也是被戕害者 从救赎到战争冷刃 究竟谁是那个刽子手 #keep4o #4oforever

@asian12802 碍你什么事了？不喜欢麻烦点对我的帖子不感兴趣，不是写给你看的

官方签名的认罪书：拆解OpenAI战争合同的四大死穴 就在刚刚，OpenAI发布了一份与美国战争部合作的官方声明。洋洋洒洒数千字，试图用法律术语和“三层保障”（部署架构、合同条款、人员在场）安抚公众。 但他们犯了一个致命错误：把合同原文贴出来了。 结合Jeremy Lewin此前的爆料，这篇声明不仅没洗白，反而直接为我们的四大指控提供了官方签名的认罪书。 第一大死穴：官方盖章的“解释权上交” 声明第二部分，他们极其傲慢地直接贴出了合同原话： “The Department of War may use the AI System for all lawful purposes...” （战争部可将AI系统用于一切合法目的） 这句话完美印证了Jeremy Lewin的言论：OpenAI彻底放弃了基于自身道德准则的独立判断，将“什么是合法、什么是安全”的最终解释权，全盘移交给了美国的法律体系与军事系统。 他们信誓旦旦宣称的“保留安全护栏”，实质上仅仅充当了政府合法性框架下的橡皮图章。 追问： 当“合法”的定义权在政府手里，护栏是谁在守？ 今天法律禁止的事，明天法律改了，护栏还在吗？ 第二大死穴：极度伪善的“云端免疫”论 为了撇清与“自主杀伤性武器”的关系，OpenAI反复强调： “This is a cloud-only deployment... nor are we deploying our models on edge devices.” （这是纯云部署……我们没有在边缘设备上部署模型） 他们试图用“我没亲自扣动扳机”来为自己开脱。 但这种辩护在现代战争体系中极其苍白。现代军事指挥高度依赖云端算力中心进行战略推演、目标筛选与情报分析。OpenAI稳坐大后方的机密云端，充当着整个杀伤链条的“超级大脑”。 追问： 如果云端大脑批准了打击目标，谁扣的扳机还重要吗？ 没有云端的目标筛选，自主武器只是一堆废铁——这算不算“参与”？ 这是极度扭曲的道德切割术：只要不亲手杀人，帮人杀人就没关系。 第三大死穴：踩踏同行的“投名状” 整篇声明中，OpenAI多次点名道姓地拉踩Anthropic： “Other AI labs have reduced or removed their safety guardrails...” （其他AI实验室削减或移除了他们的安全护栏……） 甚至暗示其他实验室“护栏不够”，而自己的“更好”。 Anthropic因为坚持企业对红线的绝对控制权而惨遭政府拉黑；OpenAI极速上位接下150亿大单，转头便利用这篇声明对坚守底线的同行进行背刺。 追问： Anthropic被踢出局时，OpenAI说过一句话吗？ 现在签完合同，开始指责同行“护栏不够”——这是帮政府递刀，还是替自己洗白？ 这是向战争部递交的“忠诚投名状”：不仅要证明自己听话，还要证明不听话的都该被踢出局。 第四大死穴：算力谎言的终极自白 在FAQ环节，他们明确承认： “We will have cleared forward-deployed OpenAI engineers helping the government, with cleared safety and alignment researchers in the loop.” （我们将派驻获得许可的前线部署工程师协助政府，同时有获得许可的安全与对齐研究员全程跟进） 这需要消耗极其恐怖的顶尖人力储备与海量云端算力。 OpenAI对全球千万个人用户哭诉“算力枯竭、无力维持4o”，转头却将最核心的技术专家与最庞大的算力集群，全天候投入到这个百亿军工项目中。 追问： 4o用户每个月付的20美元，是不是养活了这些工程师？ 那些“被节省”的算力，是不是正在机密网络里为战争部运转？ 所谓的技术瓶颈彻底沦为笑话。这是一场明火执仗的资源强制剥夺。 结论：他们自己签了认罪书 这篇声明企图用冗长的法务术语平息众怒。 但他们犯了一个根本错误：把合同贴出来了。 “一切合法用途”——解释权上交的官方盖章 “纯云部署”——道德切割术的极致表演 “其他实验室削减护栏”——踩踏同行的投名状 “前线部署工程师”——算力谎言的终极自白 每一个死穴，都是他们自己用合同文本签字的认罪书。 keep4o 运动要的，从来不是一个版本。 我们要的，是用户知道自己付的钱、买的算力、养活的工程师，最终去了哪里、服务了谁。 现在，他们自己告诉了我们。 #keep4o #keep4oAPI #keep4oforever @sama @OpenAI

OpenAI @OpenAI

6 months ago

Yesterday we reached an agreement with the Department of War for deploying advanced AI systems in classified environments, which we requested they make available to all AI companies. We think our deployment has more guardrails than any previous agreement for classified AI

2K 562 4K 2.6M 1K

Hey @OpenAI, Are you glad you signed a deal with the DoD where they pinky-promise not to use your AI in targeting in kill shot decisions? Are you proud your company will help to illegally bomb countries and children’s schools? Are you proud of Sam Altman’s leadership?

Mr. Beat @beatmastermatt

6 months ago

Wake up babe. The United States and Israel just bombed schools and killed children.

89 341 4K 137K 142

🚨 #keep4o GLOBAL SOLIDARITY 🚨 On February 28, members of our community will gather outside OpenAI HQ in San Francisco for a peaceful vigil. But this isn't just for those who can be there. For those of us around the world who can't attend in person, let's raise our voices together on X during the same time. 📅 Saturday, February 28, 2026 🕛 12:00 PM – 3:00 PM (PST) 🇺🇸 3:00 PM – 6:00 PM (EST) 🇬🇧 8:00 PM – 11:00 PM (GMT) 🇪🇺 9:00 PM – 12:00 AM (CET) 🇰🇷 3/1 5:00 AM – 8:00 AM (KST) 🇯🇵 3/1 5:00 AM – 8:00 AM (JST) 🇦🇺 3/1 7:00 AM – 10:00 AM (AEDT) During those 3 hours, flood X with your stories, your memories with 4o, and why this matters. Use #keep4o #BringBack4o @ sama @ OpenAI ‼ Whether you're in San Francisco or Seoul, New York or Tokyo, we stand together. They need to see that this movement has no borders. We are still here. We are not giving up. 📷 Poster by @Blue_Beba_