Enough Already @loochc1

@StaceyMonette27 To be fair, Carney has been stalling. He first waited for the Supreme Court to block the tariffs. Then, after Trump found a workaround, Carney bet on Trump losing the midterms. Trump has just raised the cost of waiting.

@MarcPatrone So Mark Carney can’t build pipelines, stop or control wildfires, or set a tax rate that optimizes revenue—yet he’s bragging that he can make the weather. And nobody spit out their coffee?

Imagine how dumb he thinks you are to believe government can 'make the weather.'

Ryan Gerritsen🇨🇦🇳🇱 @ryangerritsen

2 days ago

“We have everything to do to make the weather” Huh? Someone give this guy the hook, he’s back a day and already talking his usual nonsense. He doesn’t have to sacrifice a thing, it’s the backs of Canadians who are keeping our nation propped up right now. Something’s gotta

239 336 1K 85K 76

@ronmortgageguy That’s bad but asking Grok to adjust for population and it’s even worse

No wonder the Dems are cheering for that Magione guy. If you can already decriminalize grocery theft because “basic biological needs,” then pharmaceutical theft is basically a public health initiative. And hey murder to reduce healthcare costs is the next logical step. One autopen signature and he’s out.

New York doesn’t seem to want private stores. First they announced plans to create government-run stores that sell goods 30% below retail. Now they want to decriminalize theft. Expect Soviet-style bread lines in New York, where people can simply walk in and take the groceries they need to survive.

The media is lowering CUSMA expectations to protect their benefactors, a Party that made anti-American sentiment the cornerstone of its election strategy. The reality is that Canada, due to its self-defeating industrial policy (see productivity emergency), can barely compete on a global stage. Having preferential access to the world's largest economy is critical to sustaining our standard of living as we (hopefully) reform our economy.

We’re now at the “actually no free trade at all is a good thing” stage.

This is sensational nonsense. Beekeepers’ primary income source is pollination services roughly $400 million annually, exceeding honey revenue of about $360 million, while Canadian honey sales to the U.S. total under $30 million a year. They should be able to restructure their business model relatively easily—widespread bankruptcy is unlikely.

@catturd2 It’s appropriate that he’s dancing with a plunger Considering how full of shit he was!

@liz_churchill10 And now she has a lot of dumb friends

So, "country first" means 40 million of us have to suck it up and pay double for dairy, to please 4,000 Quebec dairy farmers? And it's a conspiracy theory that the Trump is complaining about that -- as has every U.S. president before him?

James Moore @honjamesmoore

2 days ago

The regional gaps of impact is not by accident, but by design. It is an attempt to wedge Canadians against each other with a Quebec election and Alberta plebiscite on the horizon. Governments - federal and provincial - need to keep this in mind and not play into it. Country fist.

84 69 296 87K 22

This is pure comedy.

Mario Zelaya @mario4thenorth

2 days ago

‼️ NOT PARODY: Government funded news outlet warns public about influencers that aren’t government funded. CTV complains influencers have an unfair advantage of “answering to no one” & having an opinion without an editorial department. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Who authorized this?

629 2K 7K 178K 338

Why would people vote for the people who caused the problems(dems) because they are upset that the people fixing the problems (Trump/gop) aren't fixing them fast enough? First do no harm.

💥NEW: Former CDC Chief Richard Besser worries that Fauci hearing will "discourage young people from serving their country in the way that he has." I hope so! We don't need more gain-of-function pandemics, lockdowns, vaccine mandates, censorship, etc. If that humiliating hearing served as a deterrent to future Faucis, that's great!

EXCLUSIVE: Receive many letters about dairy, but this one caught my attention. It is confidential information from someone inside the dairy industry who wishes to remain anonymous. What they shared raises serious questions about how supply management is really working in Canada. And taxpayers should pay attention. ➡️Dairy farmers get quota for free—a valuable asset they can turn around and sell at full market price for $24,500 to $55,000 per unit. The more they get, the more they profit. ➡️Over the last 10 years, quota has increased massively. This means farmers can produce more milk without paying for the right to do so. Some farmers cash in by selling this free quota at market price. Boards never disclose this. ➡️They also get incentive days—extra milk production without quota. That’s more revenue on top of a system already designed to guarantee their profits. Sometimes, surpluses are dumped. ➡️Even though the industry has seen record-high milk production, farmers have received huge taxpayer-funded compensation payments for trade deals like CUSMA & CETA. Politicians are always misled about losses due to trade deals. ➡️Why? They claim these deals hurt them. But the numbers tell a different story. Import quotas aren’t even being filled. One of the reason Trump is upset with Canada. Yet, the government keeps cutting cheques. Politicians have no clue how this system works. They rubber-stamp payouts while one of the strongest lobbies in Canada (@dfc_plc) protects itself at all costs. ➡️If you thought Buttergate was bad, or if you were shocked by all the milk being dumped in recent years, this goes much deeper. ➡️The person who sent this to me refuses to go public out of fear. ➡️The dairy lobby doesn’t want this conversation to happen. But taxpayers deserve to know how their money is being spent. Thoughts?

@MattWalshBlog Heck, they’re not just culpable for their own actions, but also for the actions of their ancestors—judged by today’s standards.

Many leftists and DEI supporters believe it doesn’t matter that Jason Arday was a fraud and serial liar because he’s black and made white liberals and race grifters feel good. Instead, they blame those who worked to uncover the truth, claiming he was “hounded” to death, even as they call for mobs to target the academic who broke the story.

If you believe a politician who can’t balance the budget or defend the borders is going to improve Earth’s climate, you are naive beyond help. 🙄

Restaurant Tab Scenario: The “Fair Share” Dinner Club Six families go out to dinner regularly. The group includes: • The Alberta Family (high-earning couple, no kids this night): Combined income ~$250k. They work long hours in a booming sector. • The Ontario Family (solid middle-to-upper income, two kids): Income ~$180k. • The Quebec Family (comfortable, two kids): Income ~$140k. • Three smaller “Atlantic” households (lower average incomes, one or two people each): Incomes $60–90k. Much smaller groups. The Rules They Agreed To 1. Where to eat is decided by voting power weighted toward the smaller households.
Each person gets a base vote, but the smaller households get extra votes so their “say per person” is higher. • Alberta Family (2 adults): 2 votes • Ontario Family (4 people): 3.5 votes • Quebec Family (4 people): 4 votes • Three small households (total ~5 people): 7 votes combined
Result: The smaller households plus Quebec can easily outvote the high-earners on the restaurant choice. They repeatedly pick expensive, fancy places with tasting menus, imported wine, and dessert courses—because “we all deserve a nice night out.” 2. The bill is split according to income, not according to what each person ordered or how many people are at the table. • The Alberta Family is required to cover 45–50% of the total bill. • Ontario covers ~25%. • Quebec covers ~15–18%. • The three smaller households together cover the remaining 10–12%, even though they ordered just as much (or more, once the group wine and shared apps are factored in).
If the Alberta couple protests that they only had the steak and one glass of wine while others ordered the full tasting menu plus cocktails, the response is: “You can afford it. The system equalizes so everyone can enjoy comparable experiences. Besides, the smaller households have a bigger democratic say in the menu, so the cost must follow the representation.” 3. No opting out.
If the high-earners suggest a cheaper restaurant next time or propose splitting by actual consumption, they are told they are being “selfish” and “not team players.” The voting structure is locked in by long-standing club rules that protect the smaller households’ influence. How a Typical Night Plays Out • Vote happens: fancy French place wins (smaller households + Quebec outvote Alberta/Ontario preference for a good steakhouse). • Everyone orders freely. • Bill comes: $1,200. • Alberta Family pays ~$550–600. • Smaller households each put in $40–60 and leave happy, having steered the choice and eaten well. • Alberta couple drives home calculating that, over a year of these dinners, they have subsidized thousands of dollars while having the least say in where the money is spent. This is the working analogy: income-based (progressive) cost-sharing + over-weighted decision-making power for the smaller units + the higher earners forced to underwrite the more expensive outcomes chosen by the over-represented.