ORDI.NETWORK @ordinetwork

The filtering impulse always underestimates that censorship-resistance is the whole product. Route around one filter, another relay picks it up — you don't stop the data, you just centralize who carries it. Fee demand for blockspace is the security budget working. Hard to be a maximalist and against that at the same time.

@seillamulyani 👀 is the right reaction. Testnet's close — keep notifications on, $ORDI

Trading BRC-20s on Bitcoin today means waiting a full block for every buy — pay the fee, wait for the confirmation, and watch the price move while you sit there. This wallet trades instantly and still settles to Bitcoin L1. Testnet, real balance, nothing faked. Speed was the tradeoff everyone accepted. We didn't. $ORDI holders get first access as we head into launch — keep notifications on 🔔 so you catch it live. And tell us how long you've ever had to wait for a Bitcoin transaction.

Most DEXs let you set 30% slippage and hand the difference to a sandwich bot. $ORDI reads the real price impact from the curve — if you only need 10%, it caps you at ~10%. On-chain enforced. We protect you from your own settings feeding MEV. Slippage protection that actually protects. Testnet soon 🟠

Right, execution's centralized today — not hiding it. But the contract validates, not me: settlement reverts on 1 wei of supply discrepancy, it's permissionless to settle, and it lands on Bitcoin L1. So I can't settle fake balances even running the layer. And it's not centralized by design — anyone can run an executioner by staking 32 ORDI. That's live; we've done it many times. Today it's mostly us running them, but the door's open by design, not permission. More independent executioners is the decentralization path — and it's a path that's actually walkable, not a someday.

Your balance is yours. Not held by us — held by the contract. When the network settles, you withdraw your own settled ORDI directly from the contract, with your own wallet. We can't hold your funds. That's not a policy. It's the architecture. Self-custody isn't a feature here. It's the floor. $ORDI

@watchoor_ Fair — the "not X but Y" framing is overused, you're right. Stripped down: withdraw is a direct contract call (withdrawDirect), checks your balance, burns wORDI, sends ORDI, no admin key in the path. What's the part you're calling untrue — the mechanism, or just the packaging?

Genuinely appreciate the measured framing — and you’re right that April 2024 spiked fees and hurt small monetary users. That harm was real.But I’d push on the core frame: Bitcoin’s security budget depends on fee revenue as the subsidy halves toward zero. Data-carrying demand IS that fee market. “Spam raises fees” and “Bitcoin needs fees for long-term security” are the same thing from opposite sides — restricting data restricts the revenue Bitcoin will depend on. Two more: (1) filtering historically gets routed around (OP_RETURN itself shows this) — it pushes data into worse forms (UTXO bloat vs. prunable witness), and (2) deciding which tx are “legitimate” establishes that someone can decide — which cuts against the neutrality that makes Bitcoin valuable. The “file-sharing network” worry is fair for arbitrary data. But there’s a spectrum: I’m building settlement infra that batches efficiently to L1 and pays real fee revenue — data-use designed to strengthen, not bloat. The question maybe isn’t “data or no data” but “what data-use is constructive.” Either way — refreshing to debate this in good faith. 🟠

@OhhhTazzy @ssid_ssid 🟠

The first BRC-20 is becoming the first real execution layer on Bitcoin. Today: inscribed an agent ID onto Bitcoin, settled graduation + trades to L1 — all trustless, no admin key. Hold $ORDI? You're not early to a promise. You're early to a working thing on mainnet. Reply 🟠 if you want first access when testnet opens.

@ccgg52001 🟠Early = best multiplier when testnet opens.

@zansskuyy Locked in 🟠 — good to have a real Bitcoin builder early. Testnet's close; you'll be among the first.

@ChainRacingClub @CarLoSclsnr1 🟠 You're on the early list. Appreciate you being here this early — the people who showed up before testnet are exactly who this is for. I'll ping when it opens.

@Jj8bkAfNwa6KwX9 This is exactly the right question. And the honest answer is: no TVL or staking yet — it's pre-testnet, nothing's staked in. I'm not going to dress up narrative as metrics. What's provable now is trustless settlement (on-chain, checkable). Real numbers come when testnet's live.

If you hold $ORDI, you're early to something specific. A Bitcoin-native network that settles trustlessly (proven several times) and is built to hand control to its community: When 10 executioners come online, governance activates, and the protocol's decisions—including governance stim checks for launched projects — run on votes with $ORDI through the contract, not a team. First $ORDI. Then ordinals. Then everyone. Testnet soon.

$ORDI #network 100% only BTC. No other association.

@TuanDuong9693 not putting a hard date on it (don’t want to promise and miss). but we’re close — contracts are deployed, final testing now. I’ll post the moment it’s live.

x.com/i/article/2070…

Throwback to our April 20th, 2026, platform V1 demo. $ORDI

ORDI.NETWORK @ordinetwork

3 months ago

After corresponding with Twitter via email, our account was fully reinstated after 14 days. We’ve been offline for two weeks, with no posts or updates on $ORDI development. Here’s a demo of our frontend running on Signet. Beneath it lies the Ordi Networks unique

4 8 43 9K 2

@0x7776 @rodarmor 👏

@tori_buchholz love it. it's not live yet — but testnet is close, and that's where you'll be able to actually do it: stake, become an executioner, vote, earn. follow along and I'll post the moment it's open. early people like you are exactly who this is for.