phyrooo @phyrooo

Minimalism maximalist. $BTC $GRIN secp256k1: b0b00009763375d6800c7bc477431cfaaf032a065d301b22dac492728ea3df29 World wide web Joined October 2009

Tweets

6K
Followers

927
Following

437
Likes

11K

phyrooo @phyrooo

10 hours ago

@thebitcoinroll @adam3us @janrothen Some more learning material if you're interested. Even Core was/is too kind to filters imo, but this could also be due to social reasons.

phyrooo @phyrooo

11 hours ago

The math behind Bitcoin's opinionated filters. Don't fight me, fight the math. claude.ai/public/artifac…

1 1 2 288 0

0 0 1 31 0

View Details

phyrooo @phyrooo

10 hours ago

@AAStack You might be interested in reading this. It's an attempt to form a distributed eclipse (or many). x.com/phyrooo/status…

phyrooo @phyrooo

11 hours ago

The math behind Bitcoin's opinionated filters. Don't fight me, fight the math. claude.ai/public/artifac…

1 1 2 288 0

0 0 0 48 0

View Details

This is the result of asking Claude to explain the eclipsing images part (graph theory) in the thread below. It may look scary at first, but it's not that complicated. It would be great if more people understood this. x.com/phyrooo/status…

phyrooo @phyrooo

9 months ago

🧵 1/ I think people misunderstood what Gloria was saying or they didn't catch the context. She said "I don't think it's transaction relay policy code's place to decide what use case is legitimate". What followed was also wrt *writing relay policy code*. youtube.com/watch?v=VsUyjF…

1 0 8 1K 5

0 0 0 107 0

View Details

phyrooo @phyrooo

11 hours ago

The math behind Bitcoin's opinionated filters. Don't fight me, fight the math. claude.ai/public/artifac…

1 1 2 288 0

View Details

phyrooo @phyrooo

a day ago

@theonevortex @Einya_Archer @adam3us @hodlonaut @saylor Yep, the whole point is to simulate a world where objects have a single position. The space (positions) is the elliptic curve and ordered sequence of moves give each "transfer" a unique travel path. That's enough to simulate unique moves like money/cash or any other object.

0 0 2 105 0

View Details

phyrooo @phyrooo

a day ago

Wrote this one for a friend and thought maybe someone else will find it useful too. And when I say "wrote" I mean I described the sections & visuals and then waited. Kind of cool that AI allows us to JIT produce explanations for friends.

0 0 1 112 0

View Details

phyrooo @phyrooo

a day ago

A high-level overview of function's _body_ content shape and execution over time. Hopefully gives an idea of why we live in very special times. claude.ai/public/artifac…

1 0 1 230 1

View Details

@

6 days ago

As someone who contributed to the public analysis¹ of BIP-148 UASF and correctly predicted how that was going to turn out, and later contributed to the public analysis² and creation³ of Libre Relay and correctly predicted how that was going to turn out...

1 28 123 29K 21

View Details

phyrooo @phyrooo

3 days ago

@dathon_ohm Doesn't this mean that anyone can make miners run their software because "mandatory signaling"?

1 0 0 42 0

View Details

phyrooo @phyrooo

4 days ago

> THE BITCOIN NETWORK WILL START REJECTING BLOCKS Knots node clients will start rejecting blocks*

Dathon Ohm / BIP-110 @dathon_ohm

5 days ago

ATTENTION. IN ONE MONTH, THE BITCOIN NETWORK WILL START REJECTING BLOCKS THAT DO NOT SIGNAL READINESS FOR BIP-110, A SOFTFORK TO REJECT THE ARBITRARY DATA STORAGE USE CASE, THEREBY REAFFIRMING THAT BITCOIN IS MONEY. (1/)

107 220 745 95K 79

1 1 12 1K 0

View Details

phyrooo @phyrooo

3 days ago

@dathon_ohm > The miners will all be running Knots Any source for this claim? Empirical data suggests otherwise.

1 0 0 67 0

View Details

phyrooo @phyrooo

3 days ago

The reason people have to scream at ChatControl 1.0 (even too aggressively!) is so that when 2.0 gets proposed (again), we have a reflex developed to scream at ChatControl 2.0. It's a situation where you'd rather have more false positives than miss with a false negative.

0 0 1 160 1

View Details

phyrooo @phyrooo

3 days ago

@AutismCapital I don't think this one means the EU can read them? That would be chatcontrol 2.0. The current one allows companies to scan private messages for csam legally I think. But it's good that people rally against this one because you want people to be loud when 2.0 gets proposed.

0 0 0 191 1

View Details

Sven Clement @svnee

4 days ago

The European Parliament voted AGAINST Chat Control. 314 to 276. And it passed anyway. Let me tell you how: they needed 361 votes to say no. On the last day before vacation. Every empty seat counted as a yes. They lost the vote. They won the law. That’s not democracy. That’s a trick. #ChatControl

744 11K 48K 976K 3K

View Details

Peter Todd @peterktodd

4 days ago

Yes, you read that correctly: the majority present voted _against_ chat control. But due to the absurdly undemocratic, illegal, procedure they're using, it comes into law anyway after being rejected multiple times before in previous votes. Insane.

Patrick Breyer #JoinMastodon @echo_pbreyer

4 days ago

🇩🇪EU-Parlament lässt #Chatkontrolle 1.0 trotz Mehrheits‑Nein (314:276) passieren – Massenscans privater Chats bis 2028 erlaubt. Betroffene warnen. Meine Einordnung und warum das der falsche Weg ist 👇 patrick-breyer.de/eu-parlament-w… #Demokratiefail

59 479 2K 250K 185

73 2K 10K 183K 480

View Details

phyrooo @phyrooo

4 days ago

European Parliament is corrupt to the core. The problem is, like always, incentive structure. There is no cost function for bad/evil behavior.

Martin Sonneborn @MartinSonneborn

4 days ago

@gandalv7 Illegaler Geschäftsordnungstrick der Parlamentspräsidentin - Eilantrag, der die Qualifizierte Mehrheit (360 Stimmen) GEGEN die Chatkontrolle gebraucht hätte, an einem Tag, an dem nur knapp 600 MEPs vor Ort waren, wegen Urlaub etc…

296 1K 9K 1.4M 656

0 0 1 141 0

View Details

phyrooo @phyrooo

4 days ago

@adam3us @BTCBreadMan > try to avoid getting forked off This. Run a node, go on a vacation and let people fork off. Let PoW resolve fork wars.

0 0 0 249 0

View Details

phyrooo @phyrooo

4 days ago

@LukeDashjr @ODELLXYZ @GrassFedBitcoin @BitcoinMotorist @DukeDukingtonRD @cguida6 @BTCtoOblivion Which part exactly?

0 0 0 36 0

View Details

phyrooo @phyrooo

4 days ago

@AdamSimecka The BIP will activate on your clients. The global order won't care about it.

0 0 3 149 0

View Details

phyrooo @phyrooo

4 days ago

@LukeDashjr @ODELLXYZ @GrassFedBitcoin @BitcoinMotorist @DukeDukingtonRD @cguida6 @BTCtoOblivion You don't force CSAM any more than any other bits in the universe that can get on the ledger through consensus rules and there's a lot that can get in today and with BIP-110. BIP-110 doesn't prevent storage of child porn on the ledger unless we pretend we don't see it.