Sergi Delgado ⚡ @sr_gi

Bitcoin Dev @2140_dev | ₿[email protected] srgi.me Barcelona, Spain Joined September 2011

Tweets

5K
Followers

5K
Following

560
Likes

5K

Sergi Delgado ⚡ @sr_gi

35 minutes ago

@cguida6 @_pretyflaco Don't bother Flaco, he's in denial.

0 0 1 12 0

View Details

Sergi Delgado ⚡ @sr_gi

2 hours ago

@cguida6 Even your leader agrees with me 🤡 x.com/i/status/20701…

Coinjoined Chris ⚡ @coinjoined

3 hours ago

It's been almost exactly one year since Luke mentioned DATUM server would be open sourced eventually... How are we doing on that front?

4 2 23 2K 0

1 0 1 47 0

View Details

Sergi Delgado ⚡ @sr_gi

2 hours ago

@cguida6 x.com/i/status/20329…

Chris Guida | ⚡🪢 BIP110 @cguida6

3 months ago

@SlimBitcoins @_Knotzi Wrong

1 0 2 76 0

1 0 1 50 0

View Details

Sergi Delgado ⚡ @sr_gi

2 hours ago

@cguida6 Nope, building your client by reverse engineering doesn't mean the protocol is open and standardized. x.com/i/status/20701…

Matt Corallo 🟠 @TheBlueMatt

3 hours ago

@lukedewolf I explicitly stated “open, standardized protocol”. DATUM is neither of these things.

4 0 2 198 0

1 0 1 49 0

View Details

Sergi Delgado ⚡ @sr_gi

3 hours ago

@oomahq Same energy youtu.be/xSVqLHghLpw?is…

0 0 3 150 0

View Details

Sergi Delgado ⚡ @sr_gi

3 hours ago

@coinjoined Looks like promises and priorities only matter when they play in your favour in an argument.

1 0 5 127 0

View Details

Sergi Delgado ⚡ @sr_gi

a day ago

@fanquake Stop, it's PG time

0 0 0 126 0

View Details

Sergi Delgado ⚡ @sr_gi

a day ago

@ElkimXOC @dathon_ohm @jonatack @L0RINC @LapiuPepe Turns out he didn't perfectly understand how it works after all.

0 0 1 40 0

View Details

Sergi Delgado ⚡ @sr_gi

a day ago

@Ko01Zero No les gusta mi humor

0 0 1 124 0

View Details

Sergi Delgado ⚡ @sr_gi

a day ago

Damn, Dathon didn't like my last tweet either. I'm on a streak recently 💔

Sergi Delgado ⚡ @sr_gi

a day ago

0 1 27 2K 0

6 0 26 1K 1

View Details

BitMEX Research @BitMEX_Jon

a day ago

The BIP-110 tank being prepared for battle

@PortlandHODL @dathon_ohm While it is more likely that people running Core will need to quickly switch over to avoid forking themselves off the network, the inverse is also possible. We will do our best to message the options and risks as best we can, especially as the activation height approaches, but I

36 12 145 91K 14

10 16 117 25K 2

View Details

Sergi Delgado ⚡ @sr_gi

a day ago

0 1 27 2K 0

View Details

…::: jon @jonatack

a day ago

@LapiuPepe @dathon_ohm Pressuring/bullying people to review your work isn’t ok in bitcoin protocol open source. Funders don’t do it. Colleagues don’t do it. Review is scarce, people review what they want to when they can, and there is no entitlement or claim on people’s’ scarce time.

8 12 95 2K 1

View Details

Mandrik @Mandrik

a day ago

Can't recommend these guys anymore. Migrating away from their services.

Start9 @start9labs

2 days ago

36 12 145 91K 14

38 15 276 25K 17

View Details

Sergi Delgado ⚡ @sr_gi

2 days ago

@btc2ikigai > I don't give a shit about Bitcoin without BIP-110. Have fun forking off

0 0 0 35 0

View Details

Sergi Delgado ⚡ @sr_gi

3 days ago

I think Luke didn't like my last tweet 🥲

Sergi Delgado ⚡ @sr_gi

3 days ago

On today's news

5 4 45 6K 1

8 0 21 2K 1

View Details

Sergi Delgado ⚡ @sr_gi

2 days ago

@btc2ikigai

0 0 0 19 0

View Details

Sergi Delgado ⚡ @sr_gi

2 days ago

@btc2ikigai That's what consensus is for, so you don't end up forking yourself off. Here it is used with the pretext of the network wanting X and miners not agreeing, when the reality is that not even a majority of the network wants X. Imagine every proposal treating with a pow change.

1 0 0 27 0

View Details

Sergi Delgado ⚡ @sr_gi

2 days ago

@btc2ikigai I'll make a good effort to explain: he is proposing a change that has a slim chance to succeed. He has stated over and over that this won't result in a hard fork. Miners that don't agree with the change are malicious, so the endgame is, and has always been, a pow change.