pabloandresmejia @supermigu

Por qué fracasó la campaña de Cepeda. Cepeda va a perder la segunda vuelta. La última encuesta de Atlas confirma la ventaja de Abelardo, pero eso no es lo más grave para él. Las segundas vueltas existen precisamente porque una elección puede cambiar. El problema es que después del golpe de la primera vuelta, Cepeda no solo no corrigió, sino que profundizó en sus errores. Hace un par de meses, cuando Mamdani ganó en Nueva York, pensé que Cepeda iba a copiar esa campaña. No me gusta Mamdani, pero hay que reconocer que su campaña fue muy buena: colores vivos, tipografías con personalidad, referencias a Nueva York, a Bollywood y a la cultura callejera. Además, una máquina digital que inundó las redes con clips de diez segundos y una capa social que volvió cool apoyarlo. El fenómeno “Hot Girls for Zohran” era absurdo, divertido y eficaz: convertía a un socialista radical en marca cultural, le quitaba solemnidad y miedo, lo sacaba del panfleto y lo metía en el feed. Cepeda tuvo la oportunidad de hacer algo parecido. Pudo dejar de parecer una amenaza y empezar a parecer una persona. Podía humanizarse, volverse menos rígido, menos solemne, menos amargado. Pudo aparecer riéndose, improvisando, hablando de fútbol, comida, familia, música, cualquier cosa que lo sacara del libreto ideológico. Pudo venderse como una especie de Shrek (un monstruo con su corazoncito), pero dejó pasar la oportunidad. Cepeda siguió siendo Cepeda. La misma cara larga. La misma mala vibra. El mismo tono de sermón. La misma campaña aburrida. La misma estética de poster universitario de bajo presupuesto. Sus piezas gráficas parecían comunicados sindicales diseñados con WordArt de los 90: letras de colores, fondos blancos, diseño plano, cero emoción, cero identidad. Y eso importa porque una campaña fea transmite desorden, vejez, burocracia y, sobre todo, incapacidad. Incapacidad de armar los mejores equipos y de estar a la altura de los tiempos. Además, se quedó en la plaza pública cuando la campaña estaba ocurriendo en el celular. Siguió hablándole a los convencidos, como si su tarea fuera mantener encendida la mística petrista, y no salir a buscar votos donde no los tenía. No fue a incomodarse. No conquistó audiencias nuevas. No entró a formatos populares. No entendió que un podcast, un stream o un clip viral pueden mover más gente que diez discursos leídos en tarima. Otro error fue creer que ya era presidente. Actuó con aire de coronación y no de campaña. La primera vuelta lo despertó de golpe, y en lugar de reorganizarse, entró en pánico y en furia. La controversia por la camiseta de la Selección Colombia fue el ejemplo perfecto. En un país emocionado por el mundial, salir a regañar a quienes se ponen la camiseta era regalarle a Abelardo el contraste ideal: Abelardo feliz, sonriente, de amarillo. Cepeda molesto, solemne, señalando con el dedo. Despreciar a Westcol fue igual de torpe. Puede gustar o no gustar, pero su comunidad es una plaza pública digital. Es el streamer más grande de Colombia. Cepeda necesitaba entrar a ese audiencia, no despreciarla. Necesitaba hablarles a esos jóvenes, no confirmarles que la izquierda los mira por encima del hombro. También le faltó transmitir tranquilidad institucional. La propuesta de la constituyente, el tono amenazante después de la primera vuelta, no reconocer el resultado electoral y una fórmula vicepresidencial que no ampliaba hacia el centro reforzaron el mismo miedo. Cepeda nunca logró demostrarle al país que sus temores eran infundados. En teoría, Cepeda todavía podría remontar. Pero remontar exige una virtud que él no ha mostrado: capacidad de adaptación. Cepeda no parece un candidato dispuesto a escuchar, corregir, ceder, modularse o cambiar de rumbo. Es un político dogmático, tozudo, intransigente, rígido y encerrado en sus certezas. Y una campaña así difícilmente cambia. Por eso Cepeda no va a cambiar. Y por eso no va a ganar. Afortunadamente.

-¡Mr. President, esto es muy grave: nos quedamos sin tungsteno! -¿Y eso qué demonios es…? Bueno, no importa: ¿a quién invadimos para obtener más? -Me temo que esta vez no es tan sencillo, Mr. Trump...

🚨 CEOS ARE QUIETLY REALIZING THE AI REPLACEMENT PLAN HAS A HUGE PROBLEM. It's called the AI cost crisis. And here's China's secret plan to capitalize on it. Bookmark this so you don't lose it. The pitch was simple: fire the humans, run the AI, save a fortune. Then the invoices arrived. An Axios report this spring confirmed it, major companies are now spending more on AI tokens than on the salaries of the workers those tools replaced. This isn't theory. Uber's CTO admitted Claude Code burned through their entire 2026 AI budget just 4 months in. Nvidia's own VP says AI compute now costs more than the people on his team. The same companies selling the dream are choking on the bill. The pullback is now spreading to Microsoft, Meta, and Amazon, where staff burning tokens just to hit internal usage targets is blowing budgets wide open. Agentic AI can eat up to 1,000x more tokens than a simple query, so the costs compound fast. Meanwhile, China is moving the opposite way. The plan is simple but ruthless. Flood the world with cheap, open-source models. Same playbook as the chip cartel. Same playbook as memory. Build it cheaper, give it away, take the market. The West is renting intelligence. China is making it free. While the West burns cash on premium tokens, China is driving the price of intelligence toward zero.

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

"La Russie n'a jamais été et ne sera jamais votre ennemie ! Nous ne voulons pas des matières premières ni des richesses européennes ; nous possédons les nôtres. Nous n'avons absolument pas besoin de vos matières premières. La Russie est le pays le plus riche du monde en matières premières. Nous ne voulons ni votre terre ni votre territoire. Regardez l'immensité de la Russie sur la carte. Elle est deux fois plus grande que toute l'Europe. À quoi nous servirait votre terre ? Qu'en ferions-nous ? Pourquoi pensez-vous que la Russie est un ennemi de l'Europe ? Quel mal la Russie vous a-t-elle fait ? Vous avons-nous vendu du gaz et des matières premières à des prix inférieurs à ceux pratiqués par vos « amis » ? OUI La Russie a-t-elle sacrifié 20 millions de personnes pendant la Seconde Guerre mondiale pour se débarrasser des nazis ? OUI La Russie a-t-elle été le premier pays à aider l'Europe pendant la pandémie de COVID-19 ? OUI Avons-nous aidé l'Europe lors des incendies et des catastrophes naturelles ? OUI Qu'est-ce que la Russie leur a fait pour qu'ils la haïssent autant ? La Russie n'est pas votre ennemie ; vos véritables ennemis sont vos dirigeants, ceux qui vous gouvernent. " Vladimir Poutine.

🇨🇳🇺🇸 | CHINA-EEUU: DOS MODELOS PARA EL CAPITAL Para el Dr. Eric Li, prestigioso politólogo —formado entre 🇺🇸 y 🇨🇳— el gran crecimiento económico de China mientras EEUU se estanca, puede explicarse por el lugar que ocupa el capital respecto de la política en cada modelo. Y dice: 1/ "En Estados Unidos puedes cambiar de partido político, pero no cambiar las políticas. En China, no puedes cambiar de partido, pero puedes cambiar las políticas. 2/ China es una economía de mercado, pero no es un país capitalista: no hay forma de que un grupo de multimillonarios pueda controlar el ejecutivo del mismo modo que los multimillonarios lo controlan en Estados Unidos. 3/ En China, el capital no está por encima de la autoridad política, ni tiene derechos consagrados. En cambio, en Estados Unidos el capital —los intereses del capital y el capital mismo— está por encima de la nación estadounidense. Por eso Estados Unidos sí es un país capitalista. 4/ En los últimos 65 o 66 años, China ha estado gobernada por un partido; sin embargo, los cambios políticos que han tenido lugar en China durante este periodo han sido más amplios, profundos y grandes que en cualquier otro país importante de la era moderna." 5/ A la pregunta de por qué China es entonces tan fuerte, no podríamos responder "porque no juega al mercado"; de hecho, ha puesto de rodillas al hasta ahora mejor de todos en múltiples sectores estratégicos. 6/ Según la tesis de Li, la ventaja competitiva de China no sino la autonomía política. Al subordinar al capital, el Estado recupera la capacidad de planificar a largo plazo, transformando la acumulación privada en un motor de infraestructura, desarrollo y justicia social, no en un fin en sí mismo. 7/ La pregunta eterna emerge cuando no se trata solo de cuántos partidos existen, sino de quién conduce realmente: ¿Es preferible la liturgia de una democracia procedimental cuya soberanía está capturada por intereses financieros transnacionales, o una autoridad política capaz de limitar a sus magnates para garantizar el bienestar material de las mayorías? 8/ La libertad de elegir gobernantes resulta irrelevante si estos carecen de libertad para elegir políticas: el 85% de los congresistas norteamericanos está controlado por el lobby y/o los CEO. Por su parte, China no tiene alternancia pero conserva una capacidad de transformación política y mejora social que es indiscutible. Desde luego, el modelo Chino no es perfecto, pero demuestra que cuando el Estado dirige y el capital obedece, los resultados económicos son mejores y los resultados sociales (En 1978, cerca del 90% de la población china vivía en pobreza extrema. En 2019, esta cifra había descendido a menos del 1%), también.

Çin ABD'yi hedef alıyor. ABD Çin'i hedef alıyor. Tarifeler, çipler, gemiler. Sürekli gerilim. Ama her ikisini de tehdit eden başka bir şey var. Bu tehdit ne savaş, ne salgın, ne kıtlık. Sebep refah. Bakın dikkatli okuyun. İnsanlık 200.000 yıllık tarihinde böyle bir tablo görmedi. Kara veba 14. yüzyılda Avrupa nüfusunun üçte birini sildi süpürdü, ama doğum oranı yüksek kaldı. Birinci Dünya Savaşı 16 milyon canı, İkinci Dünya Savaşı 70 milyon canı aldı. İkisinin de ardından doğum patlaması yaşandı. İspanyol gribi 50 milyon insanı götürdü, doğurganlık etkilenmedi. Bütün felaketler insan türünün üreme içgüdüsünü durduramadı. Bugün ilk kez insanlık kendi eliyle nüfusunu eritiyor. Önce kısa bir not: Bir kadın hayatı boyunca ortalama 2.1 çocuk doğurursa nüfus aynı kalıyor. Buna "nüfus yenilenme oranı" deniyor. Bu rakamın altına düşen ülke küçülmeye başlıyor. İnsanlık tarihinde her dönem doğum oranı 2.1'in üstünde kaldı. Felaketler nüfusu düşürdü, ama doğum oranını düşürmedi. Modern çağ bu düzeni bütünüyle tersine çevirdi. Bugün gelişmiş hiçbir ülkenin doğum oranı 2.1'in üstünde değil. Bütün gelişmiş ülkeler sessizce küçülüyor ve küçülme hızı her yıl biraz daha artıyor. Refah haritası: ters orantı mükemmel Sayılar tabloyu net ortaya koyuyor. Güney Kore 0.73 Hong Kong 0.7 Çin 1.02 Japonya 1.2 ABD 1.6 Türkiye 1.6 Hepsi yenilenme oranının altında. Şimdi Afrika'ya bakalım. Nijer 5.9 Çad 6.0 Somali 6.0 Mali 5.5 Bağlantı kesin: ülke ne kadar zenginse doğum o kadar az. Bu bir tesadüf değil, sistemik bir tablo. Refah neden öldürüyor? Cevap yüzeyde basit görünüyor: konut fiyatları, eğitim maliyetleri, çocuk bakımı, kariyer baskısı, geç evlilik. Ama bunların altında çok daha derin bir mantık var. İnsanlık iki yüz bin yıl boyunca çocuğu hayatta kalma garantisi olarak gördü. Çocuk demek yaşlılıkta bakım, tarlada işgücü, soyun devamı demekti. Modern toplum bu denklemi tamamen yıktı. Yaşlılığa artık devlet bakıyor. Ekonomide makineler çalışıyor. Soyu sürdürmek bir zorunluluk olmaktan çıktı. Hiçbir politika tutmadı. Japonya onlarca yıldır bonus, vergi indirimi, çocuk yardımı dağıtıyor. Doğum oranı düşmeye devam ediyor. Güney Kore son yirmi yılda demografi krizine 200 milyar dolar harcadı. Sonuç: doğum oranı 1.2'den 0.7'ye düştü. Çin önce iki çocuk politikası, sonra üç çocuk politikası getirdi. Hiçbir etkisi olmadı. Para çare olmuyor. Çünkü mesele para değil, tercih. İki şey aynı anda yaşanıyor. Bir: gelişmiş dünya küçülüyor. Avrupa bugün 740 milyon nüfusa sahip. 2100'de 580 milyona inebilir. İki: Afrika genişliyor. Bugün 1.5 milyar olan nüfus bu şekilde büyümeye devam ederse 2050'de 2.5 milyara, 2100'de 3.8 milyara çıkacak. Yüz yıl sonra dünya nüfusunun %38-40'ı Afrikalı olacak. Çin bunu çok önceden gördü. Çin Afrika'da 49 ülkeye altyapı yatırımı yaptı. Demografiyi kim kazanacak diye soran ve cevabını uygulayan tek ülke. ABD ve Avrupa hâlâ kendi iç krizlerine bakıyor. Bu sadece sosyolojik bir kriz değil. Bu önümüzdeki 30 yılın en büyük makro hikayesi. Çünkü demografik çöküş finansal sistemin temel taşlarını sıraya sokuyor. Birinci halka: Emekli krizi. Çalışan azalıyor, emekli artıyor. Sosyal güvenlik fonları açık veriyor. Çin'de 2010'da her emekliye 5 çalışan vardı. 2050'de bu oran 2'ye düşecek. Japonya'da bu oran zaten 2'ye düştü. İkinci halka: Devlet borç patlaması. Az vergi geliri + çok emekli aylığı = sürdürülemez bütçe açığı. Japonya'nın borç/GSYİH oranı %230. Dünyada en yüksek. ABD aynı yola giriyor. Çin daha hızlı tırmanıyor. Üçüncü halka: Para basma zorunluluğu. Borçtan kurtulmanın iki yolu var. Geri ödemek ya da paranın değerini düşürmek. Geri ödemek imkânsızsa kalan tek yol para basmak. Borç olduğu yerde kalır, paranın değeri erir. Dördüncü halka: Sert varlıkların yükselişi. Para birimleri enflasyonla eridiğinde, tarih boyunca olduğu gibi servetini korumak isteyenler altın, gümüş, bitcoin, gayrimenkul gibi varlıklara yöneliyor. Son nokta İnsanlık tarihinde ilk defa kendi kendini gönüllü olarak küçültüyor. Sebep ne savaş, ne salgın, ne kıtlık. Sebep refahın kendi tasarımı. Bu bir politika krizi değil. Modern medeniyetin matematik denkleminde köklü bir hata var. Belki yapay zeka ve robotlar üretkenlik açığını kapatır. Belki Afrika önümüzdeki yüzyılda dünyanın merkezi haline gelir. Belki insanlık bambaşka bir toplumsal yapıya evrilir. Ama bir gerçek değişmiyor. Bugünkü gelişmiş dünyanın yüz yıl sonra hâlâ aynı haritada aynı yerde olma garantisi yok. Sermaye bu denklemi çoktan görmeye başladı. Gelişmeleri takip ediyorum, sizi bilgilendireceğim.

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

LA GUERRA QUE DESTRUYÓ LA PROPAGANDA ANTIIRANÍ 🔥💥 En solo cincuenta días de conflicto, la atención mundial ha desmantelado por completo la imagen caricaturesca que los medios afines a Israel construyeron durante décadas sobre Irán. Lo que ahora queda claro: 1. Irán no está gobernado por “mulás locos” 🇮🇷👔. Sus dirigentes son tecnócratas altamente calificados, con doctorados en ciencias políticas, filosofía, relaciones internacionales y matemáticas, formados en universidades de prestigio y autores de obras serias sobre Kant, gobernanza y negociación. 2. El pueblo iraní es profundamente patriota ✊❤️. Demostró su coraje formando cadenas humanas para proteger infraestructuras críticas y rechazando cualquier intervención extranjera. Lejos de huir, muchos iraníes en el exterior regresaron al país al iniciarse el conflicto. 3. Irán es un ejemplo de resiliencia 💪🛡️. Tras décadas de sanciones ilegales, máxima presión y agresiones, construyó una base industrial, militar y científica sólida con sus propios recursos. Mientras otros países ya se quejan por semanas de cierre del Estrecho de Ormuz, Irán resistió casi medio siglo de bloqueo. 4. Irán no es un “estado patrocinador del terrorismo” ❌🔥. Su único “delito” ha sido oponerse con firmeza y sin ambigüedades al apartheid y las políticas genocidas de Israel. Esa es la verdadera razón de la demonización sistemática. 5. Irán invirtió en su pueblo 🏥🏛️🚄. Los hospitales, universidades, aeropuertos, ferrocarriles, plantas petroquímicas y fábricas destruidos por los ataques demuestran claramente dónde se destinaron sus recursos: en desarrollo nacional, no en desestabilización regional. 6. Irán nunca buscó la guerra 🕊️🤝. Practicó una diplomacia seria que fue traicionada en repetidas ocasiones, incluido el retiro unilateral de EE.UU. del JCPOA y dos ataques mientras se negociaba. 7. Su política exterior se guía por principios, valores y orgullo nacional ⚖️🌍, no por meros cálculos materialistas de costo-beneficio. Entender esto es clave para cualquier acuerdo real. La narrativa israelí-estadounidense sobre Irán se ha derrumbado. Lo que queda es la imagen de una nación soberana, resiliente y digna que se niega a arrodillarse ante el imperio. ¡Es hora de actuar! 📢🚨 Comparte esta verdad, exige el fin inmediato de las sanciones ilegales contra Irán, denuncia la propaganda de guerra y defiende el derecho de los pueblos a la soberanía y la autodeterminación. La resistencia antiimperialista se fortalece con cada voz que se alza. #IránReal #FinDeLaPropaganda #ResistenciaAntiImperialista #Soberanía #NoALaGuerra #VerdadSobreIrán #AntiImperialismo #LevantaLaVoz 🇮🇷✊🔥

You said America "entered a war that was not theirs." Operation Barbarossa began June 22, 1941. Pearl Harbor was December 7, 1941. For the first six months of the most destructive military campaign in human history, America was not in the war at all. The Soviet Union was bleeding out against the full weight of Nazi Germany while America was still neutral. Then you said America "helped turn the tide." Let's be precise about what the tide looked like before America arrived on the Western Front. Stalingrad: July 1942 to February 1943. The destruction of the German 6th Army and its allies. Somewhere between 800,000 and 1,500,000 Axis casualties. The strategic turning point of the European war. Americans were in North Africa. Kursk: July 1943. The largest tank battle in history. The German offensive capacity on the Eastern Front was permanently broken. Americans were in Sicily. By the time American and British forces landed in Normandy in June 1944, the Soviet Union had already been fighting for three years, had already absorbed the worst the Wehrmacht could deliver, and had already broken the German Army's back. On a scale of destruction with no equivalent in Western European military history. Then you said America "rebuilt Europe" with the Marshall Plan, as if "generosity" in 1948 is a response to a question about who defeated Nazi Germany between 1941 and 1944. These are different questions. America's postwar economic leadership is real. It is also separate from the military history of who bore what cost in actually defeating fascism. My point, and I notice you asked "your point?" as if there wasn't one, which is itself interesting, is this: American children learn that America won World War II. They do not learn that the Soviet Union suffered 27 million dead. They do not learn the scale of Stalingrad. Not as a number. Not as a feeling. They do not carry it the way they carry Pearl Harbor and D-Day. So they grow up believing, in their bones, that when the world needed saving, America showed up and saved it. That belief then becomes the psychological template for every subsequent intervention. We saved the world once. We are the kind of people who save the world. Therefore when we intervene, we are saving. The 27 million Soviet dead do not fit into that template. So they are omitted. Not from every textbook, the numbers exist, they can be found, but from the felt, emotional, cultural understanding of what that war was. You just demonstrated this in real time. You responded to "the Eastern Front was the decisive theater of World War II" with "America entered a war that wasn't theirs and helped turn the tide." You re-centered America. Automatically. Without noticing you did it. That's not an argument. That's the curation working exactly as designed.

Knowing @Knowing14557733

3 months ago

@nxt888 Of course Russia paid a major toll. Most of Europe had been conquered. Yet America entered a war that was not theirs and helped turn the tide. Then had to fight Japan. The British Commonwealth, was our primary ally in the Pacific. Then rebuilt Europe. Your point?

24 0 1 37K 0

🚨'US has become the pirate of the world' — Jiang Xueqin 🚨The US intentionally sabotages global energy markets to force Europe and Asia to buy American oil, desperately trying to save the petrodollar. 🚨"America used to be the policeman of the world. Now it's become the pirate. In the short term, the strategy works. In the long term, the world will unify against this piracy."

The spokesperson for the Chinese Foreign Ministry schooled Trump. he won't forget this lesson for the rest of his life👏 Mao Ning: If we look for any crisis in the world right now, it would be America as the main participant in it—this man (referring to Trump) has been in charge, and all he does is go to the Gulf to take some money and to ^Israel And at the end of the day, American media tells us about America's civility, progress, and humanity. American journalist: This is the truth of America—the most advanced country in all fields, as evidenced by the fact that the world's current official currency is the American dollar. Mao Ning: That's not true. The dollar has been the official currency for more than 100 years for other reasons we won't discuss. Look at the clothes you're wearing right now—you'll find they're made in China. Trump's personal phone is made in China, the lunch he'll eat today is from African lands, and the gasoline in the car he's driving is also from the Gulf. Where's the progress and development you're talking about!? You're like the little boy waiting for his daily allowance from his dad, and when his dad dies, he'll become a homeless bum. I swear to God, the strongest speech I've heard in my life. Bless the womb that bore you—by God, you're worth 100 men👏👏♥️♥️♥️

​𝐒𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐟 𝐒𝐚𝐫𝐡𝐚𝐧 | العرّاب 🕶️ 🇦🇹🏹🏹 @SarhanSher99318

4 months ago

المتحدثه بإسم وزاره الخارجيه الصينيه علمت تر. امب درس مش هينساه طول حياته👏 ماو نينج : اذا بحثنا عن اي از.مه ف العالم ف الوقت الحالي ستكون امر. ىكا مشارك رئيسي فيها هذا الرجل (تقصد تر. امب) منذ توليه القياده وهو لايفعل شيئ سوا الذهاب للخليج لأخد بعض الاموال ود ^عم اىىراىىل

0 2K 6K 294K 366

🚨 THE DOMINOES ARE FALLING. IN MONTHS, NOT YEARS. Powell just confirmed what bond traders have known for years: The US debt spiral is UNSTOPPABLE without immediate action. "It will not end well." — Jerome Powell, Fed Chair, 2026. Here's the exact timeline of how this ends: Step 1 ✅ Debt grows faster than economy — CONFIRMED TODAY by Powell Step 2 ✅ Annual interest payments hit $1,000,000,000,000+ — ALREADY HAPPENED Step 3 ✅ Two credit rating agencies (S&P, Fitch) already downgraded US debt Step 4 ⏳ Congress deadlocks on spending cuts — HAPPENING NOW Step 5 ⏳ Japan and China slow their Treasury purchases Step 6 ⏳ Bond market vigilantes strike — 10-year yield spikes past 6% Step 7 ⏳ Mortgage rates hit 9-10% — housing market freezes Step 8 ⏳ Fed forced to choose: let yields spike OR monetize debt Step 9 ⏳ Either path triggers a financial crisis Step 10 ⏳ Social Security stress arrives years ahead of schedule Step 11 ⏳ Dollar starts losing reserve currency status Step 12 ⏳ The biggest debt crisis in human history arrives Steps 1-3 already happened. Steps 4-7 will happen within months. Steps 8-12 by end of the decade. When the Fed Chair says "it will not end well" — that's not a warning. That's a forecast. Bookmark this. Screenshot this. Come back in 90 days.

BREAKING. Thirty-six hours ago President Donald Trump said “obliterate.” This morning he said “productive conversations.” The question every trader, diplomat, and general is asking: what broke between Saturday night and Monday morning? Six things broke simultaneously. Not one of them was Iranian. First. The bill arrived. The Pentagon requested over $200 billion in supplemental funding. The war cost $11.3 billion in six days, $16.5 billion in twelve. At $1.38 billion per day and accelerating, congressional resistance to the supplemental is real. The money that was supposed to fund “days not weeks” now needs a vote that may not pass. Second. The Fed killed the rate-cut thesis. On March 18, the Federal Reserve held rates at 3.5 to 3.75 percent and revised its 2026 PCE inflation forecast to 2.7 percent from 2.4, citing the Iran war energy shock. The dot plot shows one cut in all of 2026, down from two. Every basis point of delayed easing is pain for housing, credit, and the Magnificent Seven. The war that was supposed to demonstrate strength is demonstrating inflation. Third. The allies revolted politely. Twenty-two countries signed up to coordinate on Hormuz. Zero committed a warship during combat. Japan is releasing strategic reserves. South Korea’s Kospi has fallen 12 percent. Europe’s gas surged 35 percent after Qatar’s LNG was knocked offline & declared force majeure up to 5 years. Trump called NATO “cowards” and got a press release. The coalition of the willing is a coalition of the waiting. Fourth. TSMC sent the signal. Taiwan imports nearly 97 percent of its energy. Its LNG reserves cover 11 days. Qatar supplies a third of global helium, which TSMC needs for chip fabrication. The helium is bottled behind a closed strait. Every Nvidia GPU, every Apple chip, every AI cluster depends on a fab in Hsinchu counting its gas in single-digit days. The Magnificent Seven have shed hundreds of billions as energy rotation crushes tech. Fifth. Birol named the damage. The IEA chief told Australia this morning that 40 energy assets across nine countries are severely damaged, global oil supply has fallen 11 million barrels per day, the crisis exceeds both 1970s shocks combined, and no country is immune. He named fertilisers and helium as interrupted flows. The man who runs global energy security called the war Trump started the worst energy crisis in modern history. Sixth. The midterms. Gas prices are up 93 cents per gallon. Sixty-six percent of Americans call this a war of choice. Sixty percent disapprove. Fifty-seven percent say it is going badly. The numbers that matter in Washington are not barrels per day. They are approval ratings in swing states where voters fill their tanks every Tuesday. Six pressures. One post. President Trump did not discover diplomacy. He discovered arithmetic. The 48-hour ultimatum was a threat. The 5-day pause is a confession that the threat’s consequences were worse than its target. Destroying power plants would have sealed the strait permanently, triggered Ghalibaf’s promise to “irreversibly destroy” Gulf desalination and energy infrastructure, crashed TSMC’s supply chain, spiked inflation past 3 percent, and handed the midterms to the opposition on a platter of $7 gasoline. The pause is real. The relief is not. The strait is still closed. The 40 assets are still damaged. The fertiliser is still blocked. The planting window is still closing. The five-day clock is already ticking. The molecules do not negotiate. The molecules wait. Full deep dive analysis: open.substack.com/pub/shanakaans…

Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡ @shanaka86

4 months ago

BREAKING: In the last 24 hours, the 2026 Iran war crossed four thresholds simultaneously. Each one would be the lead story of any other week. Together they form the architecture of an escalation spiral that has no off-ramp visible from any capital on Earth. First. Iran struck

132 1K 3K 2.8M 1K

The Pentagon’s own wargames show China can sink the USS Gerald R. Ford. And China just handed Iran the tools to prove it. The leaked 2025 Overmatch Brief, the most classified US naval simulation conducted last year, concluded that in a Taiwan conflict, Chinese hypersonic anti-ship missiles overwhelm carrier strike group defenses and send the Ford to the bottom. The $13.3 billion crown jewel of American naval power, destroyed in a simulation by the same country that is now selling CM-302 supersonic anti-ship missiles to Iran and delivering electronic warfare systems capable of jamming F-35s operating from carrier decks. The Ford departed Souda Bay, Greece yesterday. She is heading directly toward the theater where those weapons are being transferred. China is running the most elegant strategic operation of the 21st century and doing it in plain sight. Step one: prove in your own wargames that you can kill the carrier. Step two: sell the missile technology to the country the carrier is being sent against. Step three: deliver electronic warfare packages that degrade the carrier’s air wing. Step four: photograph every asset in the strike architecture and publish it so the target knows exactly what is coming and from where. Step five: sit back and watch whether America sails its most valuable warship into the kill zone anyway. If the Ford survives, China learns how American carrier defenses actually perform against the weapon systems China designed. If the Ford is hit, China has achieved the single most consequential military intelligence victory since Enigma: real-world combat data on how to sink an American supercarrier without firing a shot themselves. Iran is not the opponent. Iran is the laboratory. MizarVision has photographed the F-22s at Ovda, the empty berths at Bahrain, the tankers at Diego Garcia, and now the Ford’s departure from Greece. Beijing has constructed a real-time intelligence mosaic of the entire American order of battle and distributed it freely. Every satellite pass is a page in the targeting manual China is writing through Iranian hands. Pentagon insiders told Politico they have 7 to 10 days of munitions. Trump decides tomorrow at 3 PM. Task Force Scorpion’s kamikaze drones stand ready to extend the campaign with $35,000 Shahed clones when the Tomahawks run dry. Geneva produced “progress” without agreement. The demands remain unbridgeable. And the Ford sails toward missiles that were designed in Chinese laboratories, tested in Chinese simulations, and sold to the country America says it will strike by March. China did not pick a side. China built the chessboard, armed both players, and positioned itself to learn from whoever loses. The Ford is not sailing toward Iran. The Ford is sailing into a Chinese experiment. And the results will determine who controls the Pacific for the next fifty years.

Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡ @shanaka86

5 months ago

China just published annotated satellite imagery of every F-22 Raptor at Israel’s Ovda Air Base. Each aircraft individually tagged in Chinese characters on Weibo. Eleven stealth fighters that cost $67 billion to develop for the sole purpose of being invisible, cataloged and

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

777 2K 8K 3.8M 3K

¿Hay algún call center o servicio al cliente peor que el de @Tigo_Colombia?

🚨 BREAKING: Trump just threatened 100% tariffs on ALL Canadian goods. Not 25%. Not 35%. One hundred percent. This is the most severe trade threat ever issued against a Five Eyes ally. But here is what you are not being told: Eight days ago, Mark Carney stood in Beijing’s Great Hall of the People and did something no Canadian PM had done in nine years. He slashed Canada’s 100% tariff on Chinese electric vehicles to 6.1%. He signed eight MOUs with Beijing. He declared progress toward “the new world order.” Four days ago, at Davos, Carney announced: “The rules-based order is fading… is not coming back.” Trump’s response today: “If Governor Carney thinks he is going to make Canada a ‘Drop Off Port’ for China to send goods and products into the United States, he is sorely mistaken.” Note the word: “Governor.” Here is what consensus is missing entirely: USMCA Article 32.10. The “poison pill.” This clause gives the United States the right to EXPEL Canada from the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement if Ottawa enters a free trade deal with a “non-market country.” China is that country. Canada just signed that deal. Trump is not bluffing. He is triggering the clause that was designed for EXACTLY this scenario. But go deeper. In August 2019, Mark Carney stood at Jackson Hole and proposed replacing dollar dominance with a “Synthetic Hegemonic Currency.” The exact phrase he used: “dampen the domineering influence of the US dollar on global trade.” This is not a trade dispute. This is a seven-year thesis being executed by a former Goldman Sachs partner who ran both the Bank of Canada and the Bank of England. Carney is not improvising. He is implementing. The strategic paradox Washington created: Every action designed to force Canadian compliance is accelerating Canadian defection. 35% tariffs → Carney went to Beijing. “51st state” threats → Carney signed eight MOUs. USMCA declared “irrelevant” → Carney slashed EV tariffs. 100% tariff threat → Canada now has nothing left to lose. The binding mechanism: When you threaten economic annihilation against an ally, they do not become more compliant. They become more diversified. Trump did not push Canada toward China. Trump DELIVERED Canada to China. This is the signature failure mode of coercive hegemony. It works until it does not. And when it stops working, it accelerates the very outcome it sought to prevent. 49,000 Chinese EVs now enter Canada at 6.1%. That quota represents a beachhead. Within five years, over 50% must be priced under C$35,000. That is BYD. That is Nio. That is CATL batteries. That is “Fortress North America” with a Chinese door. Watch CAD/USD. Watch the USMCA review in July 2026. Watch whether Mexico follows Canada’s template. America is building the multipolar world it fears. One ally at a time.

“I think the world must realize that China will not converge with Western norms, and it will find its own path to modernity,” Singaporean Prime Minister Lawrence Wong said in a recent interview with the Financial Times, noting that China is a technological leader in many areas, in advanced manufacturing, in renewable energy, and the world has to contend with and accept the reality that China is not just a rising power, it is a risen power. China recently decided to forgo its special and differential treatment provisions in the WTO. In just this past year or so, it has doubled down on its support for global institutions. These are examples of how we have to embrace the reality that China will be a key player, and potentially a key leader, in this new global system, said Wong.

@RnaudBertrand ¿Qué más te soñaste?

Ari, the only country that’s bombed Japan is the United States. Twice. China rebuilt it. America erased it. You call it a "protection umbrella," but what kind of umbrella rains nuclear fire? What kind of ally still stations troops on your soil eighty years after the war ended? You say China is "itching for expansion," yet China hasn’t invaded a single country in over four decades, while the U.S. has invaded more than a dozen in the same time. Panama, Iraq, Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, Somalia, Sudan, Yemen, Haiti, Ukraine: all under the same banner of "defense" and "stability." You call it "deterrence." The world calls it occupation. And when you say "we’re about to see what happens when U.S. power wanes," what you really mean is: The world might finally get to breathe without your aircraft carriers circling its shores. The U.S. didn’t preserve peace in East Asia. It froze the region inside its own security architecture. It built alliances not to protect Japan or Korea, but to contain China, isolate the DPRK, and keep the Pacific an American lake. China doesn’t need to "retake" Japan or South Korea. It already trades more with both than America does. Influence through commerce, not conquest. That’s what real power looks like. You talk about polio vaccines? Washington is the disease it claims to cure, injecting war to prevent peace, fear to preserve control. U.S. power doesn’t prevent large wars. It prolongs small ones. And when that power fades, the world won’t fall apart. It will fall silent, for the first time in a century, without American bombers overhead. That’s not the end of stability. That’s the end of empire.

You sound like a colonial ghost screaming at the future. You say China "betrayed civilization" as if "civilization" means obeying Western banks, kissing NATO’s boots, and cheering as U.S. bombs fall on every country that dares to nationalize a resource. Who should they thank? The same West that turned the Opium Wars into economic policy, then lectured the world on morality while burning Asia to the ground? Let me explain betrayal. Betrayal is colonizing half the planet, then acting shocked when the other half builds without you. Betrayal is lecturing others on democracy while propping up tyrants from Pinochet to Netanyahu. Betrayal is rewriting history to erase every coup, every massacre, every IMF trap you designed. You say Europe "woke up"? Europe is sleepwalking into irrelevance, screaming at Marxist shadows while the world trades in yuan, builds with BRICS, and bypasses your crumbling empire. You say the "CCP" lies? This from the side that called Iraq "liberation," Libya "humanitarian," Vietnam a "mistake," and Gaza a "self-defense operation." You think Ukraine is a victory? The West bled it dry for weapons contracts and PR. Now its economy is rubble, its people shattered, and its NATO patrons already drafting exit strategies. You call that "victory." The rest of the world calls it a warning. You say the Chinese people will rise? They already have, out of poverty, illiteracy, and humiliation. They rose from famine to fusion reactors, from opium to orbital stations. And they did it without invading a single country. Can Europe say the same? China doesn’t want your democracy. It watched what you did with it: sold it to billionaires and bombed anyone who said no. And Tibet? Spare us the tears. You didn't cry for the Congo, for Chile, for Yemen, or for Palestine. You cried when you lost control, not when you lost lives. Your rant isn’t prophecy. It’s projection. Everything you say about China is what the West did to the world. You just can’t stand that someone finally stood up. Your "awakening" is nothing but nostalgia for a world you no longer control. You call Chinese unity "totalitarianism" because you can’t buy it, break it, or Balkanize it. You can’t imagine a civilization that doesn’t need your approval, so you claim it must be doomed to collapse. You still dream of a grateful, partitioned China. Tibet ripped away, Hong Kong as a colony, the mainland "democratized" into a hundred client states. The Chinese "becoming" the kind of people you wish they were: docile, divided, eager to hand back their land and their pride, always ready to play the grateful apprentice while Europe lectures them about "harmony." That’s not liberation. That’s what you did to Africa, to the Middle East, to the Soviet Union. Every time China refuses your "aspirations," you call it betrayal. But let’s talk about gratitude, Rudy. Did the Vietnamese owe you gratitude for the bombs that fell on their villages? Did the Congolese owe Belgium thanks for the severed hands and stolen rubber? Did the world owe Europe for the century of genocide, partition, and plunder it called "civilization"? The 21st century has no more room for messianic Europeans who still think they’re owed gratitude for centuries of theft. The only lesson the world has learned from your era is this: Never trust a master who calls himself your friend. Call it communism, totalitarianism, or whatever buzzword helps you sleep. The truth is, you hate China because it built what you couldn’t, without you. And it doesn’t need your permission. That’s not betrayal. That’s liberation.

ruediger drischel @RudyDrischel

9 months ago

@nxt888 @Will37138763 The most ugly persons are the ungrateful persons who smile into your face when they need you and spit into your face when they don’t need you anymore. Luckily the West awakes and has understood the challenge of the betrayal of communist China at a human civilization built on

47 1 1 34K 3