sure @suresureyeah

Joined July 2018

Tweets

47
Followers

32
Following

1K
Likes

123K

sure @suresureyeah

2 years ago

@Tom_Gann

1 0 1 118 2

View Details

sure @suresureyeah

2 years ago

@HealthUntoDeath have you read the hatred of poetry by ben lerner - is enjoyable & is about this type of thing

1 0 0 123 0

View Details

sure @suresureyeah

2 years ago

@ainiladra thank you! I will

0 0 1 39 0

View Details

sure @suresureyeah

2 years ago

@ireallyhateyou I am sending you good wishes!! I feel for you & I think you do incredible work

0 0 0 116 0

View Details

sure @suresureyeah

2 years ago

@dj_CISWOMAN

0 0 2 563 1

View Details

@T_om_s Im a Lucy innocent truther. But to me it's pretty easy to explain why the consultants were initially not believed: because they had no good evidence literally at all at all at all. When they kept trying to scapegoat her & eventually managed - that's when it became a scapegoating

0 0 2 481 0

View Details

sure @suresureyeah

2 years ago

@T_om_s nothing you're talking about relates to like the actual case. The q's are 1) did they provide good evidence of foul play & 2) did they provide good evidence that Lucy was responsible. I don't even think they managed number 1

1 0 7 1K 1

View Details

sure @suresureyeah

2 years ago

@S_DeGooyer @farahbakaari her husband is a protestant from the north who doesn't seem to want the end of british rule in ireland - presumably he is also a normal/loving man&husband. her discomfort w applying the term 'settler-colonist' to settler-colonists might not be despite him

0 0 1 96 0

View Details

sure @suresureyeah

2 years ago

@PerthshireMags I know at the moment it seems like it's just cranks or whatever, who have a problem with the case. But in reality the case is fucked. I don't know that it should be such a crazy idea to think that the police and the media have pilloried and unfairly convicted someone?

0 0 0 203 0

View Details

sure @suresureyeah

2 years ago

@PerthshireMags Odd to comment, sorry, but I do also think it's a pretty classic mis-trial. I study medical statistics. All the hallmarks of misuse of statistical evidence.

1 0 0 543 0

View Details

sure @suresureyeah

3 years ago

@bySamStevenson @MaxParry4 @Daily_Express wait... you're the worst person ever lol

0 0 1 94 0

View Details

sure @suresureyeah

3 years ago

@MouinRabbani @threadreaderapp unroll

1 0 0 69 0

View Details

sure @suresureyeah

3 years ago

@lucaajwatson you are evil!

0 0 0 338 0

View Details

sure @suresureyeah

3 years ago

@skjask you're pure evil

0 0 1 104 0

View Details

sure @suresureyeah

3 years ago

@onyxtopos @christapeterso i want to say thank you too!!! im in awe of you & this seems stupid to say but i hope that looking clearly at the worst things in the world - & getting shouted at for doing so - is not hurting you too much

1 0 2 77 0

View Details

sure @suresureyeah

3 years ago

@BoobyJargon @christapeterso such as what fire does to a variety of material? what a bullet hole looks like? u do not need to be an expert to have absorbed a decent amount of info about those things in ur life! Point to where u believe her 'lack of experience' has lead her to error??

0 0 2 104 0

View Details

sure @suresureyeah

3 years ago

@JamesHarrisNow @shattenstone & i think the reason that i feel angry about the article and you do not is maybe because - if you write for the spectator and you love shane and his music, then your interpretation of his music must not overlap with mine

0 0 0 39 0

View Details

sure @suresureyeah

3 years ago

@JamesHarrisNow @shattenstone (imo!) the writer does not spot/connect with/feel what is beautiful/meaningful about shane’s work - and so he spends a weird amount of the word count describing his looks/bodily functioning - its (imo) invasive and shallow at the same time.