Sarim Hussain @technophysician

@aidenlewiis Wow. Great going!!! Wholesale or arbitrage ?

@1000asins REBATE

@FelixAmazonCat Insane numbers

@Enuffles Great. Your margins are good. Any tips for good margins ?

Steady Progress. Target of £100000 by the year end. Hope we can achieve it before the client deadline #Amazon #WholesaleFBA #FBA

Dolman City REIT (#DCR) #PSX

My take on Optimus’ HUBC report: -The CPHGC true-up risk is real and material. Optimus estimates annual ROE falling from $129.9m to $92.2m. With HUBC’s 47.5% stake, that could translate into roughly PKR 5bn / PKR 3.9 per share of annual earnings impact if the determination ultimately stands. -Where I disagree is with the certainty implied by “A Matter of When, Not If.” Nobody can predict litigation with certainty. Without examining the complete record and grounds of appeal, I also cannot comment on the merits of CPHGC’s case. -The sensible approach is therefore to probability-weight the risk, not assign a 100% probability of losing. Even an adverse appellate decision may not necessarily mean finality, as further recourse to higher courts could remain available. -I have similar reservations about automatically assuming comparable ROE cuts for TEL and TNPTL before their respective true-ups are determined. -On Optimus’ assumption of a ~9% ROE reduction for TEL and TNPTL, the combined impact on HUBC would be only about Rs0.8/share in annual EPS, or roughly 2% of FY25 EPS. -So while Optimus has identified a genuine downside risk, its PKR 176 fair value looks closer to a bear-case valuation than a probability-weighted base case to me. -Also, HUBC is no longer just a legacy IPP portfolio. BYD/MMPL, E&P and mining provide meaningful optionality, and Optimus values MMPL at only around PKR 20/share. On a personal note, I have to admit the predicting an outcome of litigation or a certain event is notoriously difficult. The risk is real. The outcome is not certain as being predicted by Optimus capital, it is not clear cut opportunity to acquire more rather one needs to be cautious. #PSX #HUBC #KSE100

@Leozidas Keep it up! I am right behind you by couple of months, just waiting for it. Wish me luck!

@BaigShayan1234 I am unable to access alphagen with google account. any updates on signin ?

If you are a freelancer and are going to file your Income Tax Return for Tax Year 2026, keep the following in mind. As I have shared many times before, there should be no confusion on this important point explained below (although even some tax professionals still disagree on it). If you are a freelancer earning income from the export of services under Section 154A, whether your tax is deducted at 0.25% or 1%, your income falls under the Final Tax Regime (FTR). Now comes the important part. Under Section 111(4A) of the Income Tax Ordinance, if your explanation for acquiring assets is based on income that was subject to final tax(freelancingincom), the amount that can be treated as explained (White source) is restricted to the imputable income, unless you furnish audited financial statements. The term "imputable income" has been specifically defined in the Ordinance. It means the amount of income that would have resulted in the same tax had that income been taxed under the normal tax regime instead of the Final Tax Regime. Let's understand this with an example. Suppose a freelancer earns Rs. 8 million during the year from the export of services and pays 1% final tax under Section 154A. -Freelancing receipts: Rs. 8,000,000 -Tax deducted @1%: Rs. 80,000 Now assume that under the normal business tax regime, the applicable tax rate on that level of income is 34%. The imputable income would be approximately: Rs. 80,000 ÷ 34% = Rs. 235,294 Now suppose the freelancer purchases a car worth Rs. 8 million and explains that it was purchased from his freelancing income. This is where Section 111(4A) may become relevant. FBR may ask: "Your income was subject to the Final Tax Regime. How do you justify the entire Rs. 8 million as explained wealth?" If audited financial statements are not available, FBR may argue that only the imputable income (approximately Rs. 235,294 in this illustration) is automatically supported under Section 111(4A) (only white income), and the remaining amount requires a satisfactory explanation. If the explanation is not accepted, that amount may be questioned under Section 111 as unexplained income or assets subject to normal tax rates as per slab. This is precisely why I believe that maintaining proper books of account and getting them audited by a Chartered Accountant is extremely important for freelancers earning income under the Final Tax Regime as required under section 111(4A). Just paying 1% or 0.25% do not discharge your liability. Whether everyone agrees with this interpretation or not, I personally have no doubt about the significance of Section 111(4A). I would encourage every freelancer to read this provision carefully and understand its implications before it is too late. One practical tip going forward -Keep a separate bank account exclusively for your freelancing business. -Receive all freelance payments in that account and pay all freelancing-related expenses from the same account. Avoid routing business receipts and expenses through your personal bank account. This creates a clear audit trail and makes it much easier to establish the source and movement of funds if FBR ever asks for an explanation. Very few people will explain these practical issues openly and in this level of detail. I hope this helps you make informed decisions before filing your return. Disclaimer: The above example is for explanatory purposes only. The actual computation of "imputable income" depends on the applicable law and tax rates for the relevant tax year, and the interpretation of Section 111(4A) may ultimately be determined by the courts.

Amer Sharif @AmerSharifOFCL

2 months ago

📢 Income Tax Return Filing Season for Tax Year 2026 Has Started From Today — Be Ready! Before filing Your tax return,it is important to understand that tax return is not merely a formality or a simple form. It is a legal financial declaration submitted to the FBR, and U are

13 29 87 327K 99

July closed at £72026 with estimated net margins of 8%. January was under £30k at under 5% net. Client Goal: £100k/month before December at 8-10% net. Agency Goal: Looking to overperform and raise the Goal bar by year end. #Amazon #WholesaleFBA

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

Since Amazon has scraped labeling services and mandated FNSKU labels, our prep costs have ballooned like 3x. For mid tier resellers this is a BIG added overhead. To reduce overheads, 1 successful trial has been Small & light SKUs. £10k worth in 2 boxes reducing prep and shipping.

@re_fba Awsome man! Hope to learn from you.

@TonyGainzzz The Jump from March to April is crazy - like 2x and then it is consistently holding up. Congratulations!

@Leozidas They may be earning interest on it sitting in their bank

@pati_marins64 @sanadliaquat

FOR ALL SELLING ON WALMART OR PLANNING TO SELL 👇 Walmart has roughly 200,000 active third-party sellers compared to Amazon's nearly 2 million. There aren't as many sellers competing in the same product category, which gives new marketplace sellers room to win customers without burning their entire margin on ads. Fewer competitors per listing means a higher chance of winning the Buy Box, which drives the vast majority of marketplace sales. Pair that with a smart Walmart repricer and you can dominate a category that Amazon sellers wouldn't touch.

@coreyganim @sanadliaquat

@YannickBuccella @sanadliaquat