Brian @theogetics

@gracetoyou The best thing about religious freedom is that it allows each religion to compete on its own merits and the best one wins over the long term.

The Gospel + Protestant work ethic fixes this

Kalshi @Kalshi

7 days ago

JUST IN: 1 in 3 men aged 20+ are neither working nor looking for a job in the US

588 643 9K 1.8M 1K

the pope and anthropic's co-founder just stood together at the vatican to release "magnifica humanitas," the first ever catholic teaching on AI yes, you read that right. the full ceremony was 2 hours. here's the most interesting things for you to know: 1. this is the biggest religious response to AI in history. popes only put out a handful of these huge official letters in their entire time as pope. the fact that one of them is about AI tells you how seriously the church is taking what's coming. 2. small detail with massive meaning: this pope picked the name "leo XIV" on purpose. the last pope named leo was leo XIII back in 1891, and his most famous act was writing the church's response to the industrial revolution. picking the same name is a deliberate signal. this pope sees AI as the new industrial revolution. 3. the catholic church does this every time a major technology reshapes humanity. they wrote "rerum novarum" in 1891 to respond to the industrial revolution. when nuclear weapons threatened the world in the 1960s, they wrote "pacem in terris." climate change and runaway tech got "laudato si" in 2015. now AI gets "magnifica humanitas." they don't issue these often. 4. the pope's main line: "AI needs to be disarmed." he literally compared AI to nuclear weapons. he said the church spent decades pushing for nuclear disarmament because the technology was too dangerous to leave in the hands of a few. he says AI is now in that same category. 5. anthropic co-founder christopher olah told the pope, on stage at the vatican, that anthropic's own research team keeps finding things inside their AI models that "mirror joy, satisfaction, fear, grief, and unease." 6. olah's reframe of what AI actually is: these things are grown. they're trained on a structure roughly modeled after the human brain and fed everything humans have ever written. in his own words: "they are made from us, from our words." he said even the people building them don't fully understand what's happening inside. 7. olah publicly admitted that every AI lab, including his own, faces pressure that can conflict with doing the right thing. commercial pressure to keep shipping, competitive pressure from other labs, plus the older pressures of pride and ambition. his solution: we desperately need outside critics with no skin in the game who will tell the labs when they're failing. 8. olah says there are 3 giant questions the AI labs cannot answer alone and the world needs religion and philosophy to step in on: > how do we make sure poor countries actually benefit from AI? > what does human flourishing even look like in this new world? > and what are these things we're actually building? 9. one of the sharpest lines in the whole encyclical: "the promise of automatic general prosperity often proves illusory." translation: the idea that AI will just make everyone rich on its own is a fantasy. someone has to actually design the system so the benefits get shared. 10. the pope also pulled out a 100-year-old quote: "contemporary man has not been trained to use power well." said by a theologian back in the 1920s. the whole encyclical is basically a long argument that we need to learn how to use this kind of power before it uses us. 11. the pope kept stressing that he doesn't have the technical answers. but he says the church has thousands of years of wisdom on what it means to be human, and that wisdom is exactly what's missing from how we're building AI right now. his closing line: this technology should serve "human flourishing and human dignity, not control consciences."

You can disagree with his use of “SSA Christian” as a category, or with his emphasis on crucifying the flesh rather vs being freed from desire. This is debate worth having. But his DQ and moral failure happened despite his teaching, not bc of it.

On the cost of following Christ: “If someone thinks the gospel has somehow slotted into their life quite easily, without causing any major adjustments to their lifestyle or aspirations, it is likely that they have not really started following Jesus at all.”

There’s a lot of misinformation about what Sam Allberry actually taught. So to clarify things here are actual quotes below from his book, "Is God Anti-Gay?" 🧵

Michael Clary @dmichaelclary

2 months ago

The Side B framework tells men their homosexual desires are not sinful. And a man who believes his that desire is not sinful has no reason to fight it. If he makes it his identity, he has every reason to befriend it, explore it, protect it from outside interference. You cannot

23 22 226 15K 62

@HansFiene I almost spit out my coffee

@JudeXXV @MikeWingerii Two or three witnesses was the minimum standard for establishing credible proof. The interpretive question is, do we judge cases on there being literal 2-3 witnesses present at any event, or on there being sufficient evidence an event occurred?

@gavinortlund @CapturingChrist In a social media environment that’s constantly filled with noise, be like Gavin.

@Pastor_Gabe I'm a charismatic Christian and I largely agree with you. Charismatic excess easily bleeds into overt gnosticism and witchcraft. There needs to be stricter checks and balances in charismatic culture.

@TexasPreacher Reformed bros would do well to get out of the X/Twitter tower as well

@DefendTheSheep Also worth mentioning that women are more likely to be Christian than men. Niezsche said it well. "Christianity is the religion of women and slaves."

@CrankyFed The Cross is meant to be a provoking symbol. It became the global symbol of Christianity for a reason.