Trevor Reilly 🌸😃 @ReillyFace

Firefighters in the mountains of Andorra airlifted an injured horse to a veterinary facility after it suffered a leg injury, according to the horse’s owner.

@Sir_Longshank @ChristianHeiens Jokes on you, I voted for Trump expecting to be disappointed and I'm very nearly not disappointed.

"If he did then it brings into question the conduct of the people in that SUV." It makes a lot of sense that security team guys would make sure other security team guys would know about the shooting, and that the VIPs those other security team guys are charged with protecting would then know.

@jeremykauffman I think this may be my favorite dunk of 2026.

The greatest story ever told.

A reminder that E. Jean Carroll publicly positioned herself as a devoted Trump admirer until he ran for president, then immediately branded him a threat to democracy. She emailed her central witness to outline a scheme and pressed her to perform their "patriotic duty." Weeks later she began writing the book that contained her allegations against him. When asked what the scheme actually was, Carroll claimed it involved a stuffed animal squirrel. The judge accepted the explanation, despite it not making any sense at all. That witness testified Carroll called her right after the supposed assault inside the Bergdorf Goodman dressing room. No one saw the billionaire at the peak of his fame enter or exit the store, and neither Carroll nor the witness could name the year, leaving Trump with no ability to provide an alibi. Carroll lied under oath about outside funding for her lawsuit. She concealed that Democrat billionaire Reid Hoffman, a close friend and advisor to Jeffrey Epstein who regularly visited Little St. James island, had paid her lawyers nearly $7.5 million. During the trial the same witness texted her daughter that Carroll had taken the matter too far and was behaving like a drug addict whose drug was herself. After Carroll told her New York had passed a law enabling her suit against Trump, a statute lobbied for by Hoffman, the witness texted that Carroll was celebrating something that had never actually happened and was in disbelief Carroll had taken it to the level she has. Carroll sued Trump for defamation, claiming his denial that she was lying caused a 50% drop in paid readership of her blog. On that blog she had published accounts of anal sex with dogs, becoming excited while watching anal rape scenes with her mother, calculating how many calories were in cum, and sharing what her Dogs taught her about sex. Carroll claimed she was a sex expert. She told the jury and judge that after the alleged incident with Trump she could no longer have sex and the experience was the sole reason she hasn't had sex since the alleged incident 30-35 years (she never remembered the year) This is what democrats celebrate. Get in their way and they will do it to you.

Ted Lieu @tedlieu

4 days ago

A reminder that a jury of ordinary Americans, after a fully litigated trial, found trump had sexually abused E. Jean Carroll.

4K 3K 13K 423K 150

@AlexNowrasteh @JohnDuttenhofer I don't think he needs testosterone replacement therapy. You, however, almost certainly do.

I love this country, but especially Nebraska.

@JonahDispatch This analogy doesn't work b/c lefties are reading "subject to the jurisdiction" like they read "shall not be infringed."

Place him on the golden throne and sacrifice 1000 libtards a day to sustain him so that he may protect the great American empire for eternity

Leading Report @LeadingReport

2 weeks ago

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas: Aliens have no equal protection rights against the federal government.

1K 5K 50K 4.0M 2K

@CathyYoung63 @BoscoCode This you?

Trevor Reilly 🌸😃 @ReillyFace

a month ago

Just look at Cathy's incredible handwaving here. "There is no issue b/c I can look back 50 years to find an example that *might* come close to being as egregious as the thing we're talking about right now." I.e.: Don't you DARE question multiculturalism! 😤

1 0 0 119 0

I took a look at this. It's a good outcome, but let me fill you in on a few facts so you understand how crazy it is that we had to litigate this at all. In 2016, there was such a huge surge of migrants on the border that DHS couldn't possibly process them all. So it set limits, and would allow a small number into the US each day to be processed, and those people could then start the process of requesting asylum. The people standing at the border who couldn't get processed right away then filed a class action lawsuit, claiming their "rights" were violated. The District Court agreed with them, and the Ninth Circuit affirmed. So our courts ruled that migrants - people who are not citizens of the United States - can use American law to sue the American government basically to let them in. That's a little simplified but more or less the case. The statutory issue is when a migrant can be considered to have "arrived in the US." The lower courts held that a migrant has "arrived" the moment he reaches the border and has any contact with US border patrol. So when an agent STOPS someone from entering, the District Court and the Ninth Circuit ruled that the migrant had in fact "arrived" in the USA, such that he can take advantage of our laws and sue our government. That is the madness that SCOTUS put a stop to today. Keep in mind also that this lawsuit has been going on since 2017. So for nearly 10 years, we have wasted resources to get a SCOTUS ruling that is just basic common sense.

SCOTUS Wire @scotus_wire

2 weeks ago

🚨 In a 6-3 vote, the Supreme Court rules that asylum seekers standing in Mexico have not “arrived in the United States” under immigration law, meaning they aren’t entitled to inspection or allowed to apply for asylum until they actually cross the border.

142 795 4K 760K 226

@CathyYoung63 @RioVeradonir @ArtemisConsort Your commitment to being an unreliable narrator would almost be impressive if the consequences weren't so ghastly.

Muscles only grow when you rest, after having stressed them during exercise. Wisdom is the same. You can only grow wise once you cringe, having stressed your mind by being retarded.

This and "A Bugs Life" game were absolutely incredible.

PlayStation Nostalgia @PlayStalgiaX

3 weeks ago

This game had no right to be that good

527 6K 57K 8.2M 6K

The way to distribute housing is in a market. We have this huge discourse about housing and it’s almost all entirely retarded, because the way to distribute housing is in a market. This isn’t difficult. Housing isn’t magical. As I like to say, housing is much more like everything else than it is different. It’s a valuable resource and we need to figure out a way to fairly distribute it. It’s called a market. You do that in a market. The way to do that is with a market. If you’re wondering, you do this with markets.

Me, too, brother. Me, too.

@CarolineSeydel @SteveSyme1 @HistoryBoomer One grammar mistake. I def still get an (A) by these standards.

@MoniqueMonsters @DocStrangelove2 That fire do be oppressive.

@SteveSyme1 @HistoryBoomer I think a benefit to discussing ideas is chasing threads and seeing where they land. "Wanye not being married to a position" is a good observation, and I don't think he's trying to be. It comes back to positing: "Is there more drawbacks to universal suffrage than benefits?"