Yurko Prokopets @YurkoFlisk

@domingogmz @sashameetsrus You mean Chris Butler, right?

This is an utterly insane story: 25,000 documents reviewed by WaPo indicate that throughout Tulsi's career, her political moves were controlled by her guru, cult leader Chris Butler. This woman was leading the world's largest intelligence apparatus. washingtonpost.com/investigations…

Absolutely insane revelations about Tulsi Gabbard. Throughout her public life, she's been a puppet for a Hindu cult. Washington Post got access to 25,000 pages of documents including directives from Tulsi Gabbard's cult leader telling her which policy positions to take and how to present herself throughout her career. It matches her record in Congress. At one point, she was instructed to say "It’s not a ‘boohoo, I don’t get to go to the party’ situation, Wolf" during a CNN interview, and used that exact phrase. This is one of several examples of her taking direct orders about what to say on TV. They told her what to tweet about too. The cult set up fake accounts to boost her on social media. Gabbard was aware, at one point telling them to add a photo to a profile. An email records a phone call where she was yelled at, but Tulsi is reminded at the end that "we still love you." This woman was always a freak, which is why she ended up in the MAGA coalition. Anti-vaxxers, criminals, racist, and a woman in a weird cult all end up as allies. Trumpism is Kakistocracy.

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

@Jazz1122341 @aykiri Seems to be bad scan and/or translation. Missing "Part III", in "Part II" unclear how "triangle ABC" (or, in general, uppercase A, B, C) is defined, strange symbol in recursive definition of u. Also, if exercise 3.4 is as it is, it's a tricky question since such p, q don't exist.

The real reason Russia is pushing the Ukraine biolab narrative is more serious than the propaganda suggests. 𝗬𝗼𝘂 𝗮𝗹𝘀𝗼 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝘄𝗼𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿 𝘄𝗵𝘆 𝗧𝘂𝗹𝘀𝗶 𝗻𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀. As the old saying goes, accuse your opponent of what you are doing yourself. Russia claims Ukraine and the United States operated secret biological weapons labs in Ukraine. That claim has not been substantiated. The UN has said it is not aware of any biological weapons programme in Ukraine, and Ukraine has repeatedly denied developing, producing, or stockpiling biological weapons. Ukraine’s facilities are publicly described as public health, disease surveillance, biosafety, biosecurity, and threat-reduction labs. Ukraine says it complies with the Biological Weapons Convention and rejects the claim that these sites were military bioweapons facilities. Russia’s position is the opposite. Russia accuses Ukraine of hidden biological weapons activity while keeping its own military biological infrastructure secretive and largely inaccessible to meaningful international scrutiny. Russia inherited the Soviet biological weapons legacy. The Soviet Union operated one of the largest and most secretive biological weapons programmes in history. After its collapse, serious questions remained about how much of that infrastructure, expertise, and military research culture survived inside Russia. Those concerns remain unresolved. The U.S. State Department has assessed that Russia maintains an offensive biological weapons programme in violation of the Biological Weapons Convention. Russia denies this, but its relevant military biological facilities remain closed, opaque, and shielded from independent verification. Ukraine’s labs are discussed as public health and disease surveillance facilities. Russia’s military biological sites are treated as restricted state secrets. Ukraine’s cooperation with the United States was linked to biosafety, biosecurity, and reducing risks from dangerous pathogens inherited from the Soviet period. Russia, by contrast, has a documented Soviet bioweapons legacy, current official compliance concerns, and restricted military facilities that outside observers cannot meaningfully inspect. In 2024, satellite imagery and expert analysis reported major construction and expansion at Sergiev Posad-6, a restricted Russian Ministry of Defence biological research site with a Soviet-era bioweapons history. The reported construction began in May 2022, shortly after Russia’s full-scale invasion and during the same period when Moscow intensified its claims about Ukrainian “biolabs.” That timing does not prove the new construction is an offensive biological weapons programme. But it does make Russia’s propaganda campaign look highly suspect. Russia demanded outrage over Ukrainian public health laboratories while expanding or upgrading its own secretive military-linked biological research infrastructure. The strongest factual argument is not that every Russian biological activity is illegal. It is that Russia has no credibility accusing Ukraine of hidden bioweapons activity while refusing transparency over its own military biological facilities. This is classic projection and deflection. Russia turns Ukrainian public health and threat-reduction work into a fake Western bioweapons plot. It shifts attention away from its own closed military biological sites. It muddies the waters around biological weapons compliance. Ukraine denies the allegations, points to peaceful public health work, and says it complies with international obligations. Russia has a Soviet bioweapons legacy, U.S.-assessed BWC violations, secretive military biological facilities, and refuses the transparency it demands from others. So when Russia talks about Ukrainian “biolabs,” the relevant question is why a country with closed military biological sites is trying so hard to redirect attention onto Ukraine’s public health laboratories.

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

Pete @splendid_pete

4 weeks ago

This video was published in January 2020. And that timing matters, because it shows Russian “Ukrainian biolab” propaganda did not magically appear after the 2022 invasion. Moscow had been dragging this corpse of a conspiracy around for years, especially against Ukraine, Georgia,

54 570 1K 62K 327

@eyepatch_man @BohuslavskaKate They try to make a very harmless image of themselves, so could be gullibility on his part. Btw, the last few days I suddenly get a lot of AllatRa ads of posts with 80k likes of their talks in EU parliament about microplastics. That's quite weird.

Newly hacked files offer rare insight into Kremlin propaganda operations. These include planting bloody pig heads in front of mosques in Paris; election interference campaigns and propaganda laundering through Israeli media. Let’s dive into #FactoryofFakes🕵️‍♂️AGAIN! 1/10

Martin Laine @Martinlaineolen

2 years ago

🚨Breaking news: Leaked docs from a Kremlin-controlled propaganda machine reveal a campaign backing far-right parties in EU elections and spreading disinformation to undermine Ukraine. Read further: vsquare.org/leaked-files-p… Let’s dive into the #FactoryofFakes🕵️‍♂️🧵 1/15

191 4K 9K 1.5M 2K

Russia is once again trying to drag Belarus deeper into its war against Ukraine. But Belarus is not Lukashenka. The Belarusian people do not want this war and do not want our country to become a launchpad for new aggression against Ukraine or against Europe. Thank you, President @ZelenskyyUa, for speaking with clarity and urgency about these threats. We must stand together to stop Russia’s attempts to spread war across our region.

Ukraine allows Putin’s May 9 parade to go ahead after Trump’s intervention and a promise to exchange 1,000 Ukrainian POWs. No prisoners have been freed, and Putin after his parade unleashed one of the biggest missile and drone barrages of the war. Here is a Kyiv high-rise where dozens were killed and injured last night, including children, and many more still remain under the rubble.

@michaeldweiss This isn't a proper use of quotes in the second case. Macron didn't say that. As for the story itself: if true, that's a shame. I'd expect Bridgit to be more liberal about such things.

In my opinion, yesterday a turning point in the war took place. Perhaps we still do not fully grasp the significance of what happened. For the first time, Putin publicly showed his weakness and inability to independently protect his capital, his parade, and himself from our strikes. Because of this, a frightened Putin was forced to publicly humiliate himself and ask Trump, as a mediator, to help stop a strike on Moscow. De facto, Putin asked Trump to protect him from the Ukrainians. I consider President Zelenskyy’s order a brilliant informational slap in the face and an additional public humiliation. It is obvious that before and during the parade, Putin was physically afraid - he felt vulnerable and threatened. Putin publicly appeared weak and humiliated, and in Russia’s "prison-style" political culture, such things are not forgiven. A weak "tsar," mocked by everyone, cannot remain a tsar in Russia. These are very, very hard times for Ukraine. However, Ukraine is strong, resilient, and continues the fight. Slava Ukraini!

Anton Gerashchenko @Gerashchenko_en

2 months ago

Putin has arrived at Red Square. A massive security presence. It looks like there are almost as many guards as guests. Putin is afraid of his own people - that’s good.

1K 3K 23K 4.0M 807

Unia Europejska jest niedoskonała, irytująca, nudna, ale niczego lepszego w naszej historii nie wymyśliliśmy. Czas pokoju, dobrobytu, wolności, demokracji i solidarności między narodami przez wieki walczącymi ze sobą to cud. Niech trwa jak najdłużej.

🤭

I don't care if some people will cry "eugenics" but we should figure out gene editing so nobody will ever have to suffer through something like this. The human body is a flawed, broken machine, and it needs to be fixed.

Gusholder Haber Bülteni @gusholderhaber

2 months ago

Kemik içerisine yayılmış, doktorların “Güneş patlaması etkisi” dediği kemik tümörü.

191 482 9K 15.9M 2K

The death penalty is the ultimate caveman position, it brings no benefit to society over, say, life in prison, it just exists so society can feel righteous despite the very obvious issues that come with it

@Maks_NAFO_FELLA I interpreted "its" as "NATO's" for ~10 seconds and got confused. Clearly the meaning is "Ukraine's". Good example of human language ambiguity. Interestingly, Ukrainian would make this clear because gendered "її" (her) would be used (Ukraine is female noun, NATO - neuter).

@beatty_bernard @morallawwithin "The initial I doing the thinking must exist" is exactly the point of Descartes' statement though, isn't it? Would "I think therefore I must have been" convey that more clearly for you?

Russian propagandist Solovyev rejoices at the humanitarian catastrophe Russia brought to Kyiv: "We have driven Ukraine into the Stone Age. Terrifying cold is approaching. The energy system is extremely sensitive to imbalance, which is why a technological disaster unfolds as key components are knocked out. When you try to put additional strain on it, the system spirals out of control. So what happens next? Kyiv will turn into a giant cesspool."

Anton Gerashchenko @Gerashchenko_en

5 months ago

A genocide against Ukrainians is unfolding right now. It already has a name: "Kholodomor" (exhaustion through cold) This crime is being deliberately committed by Russia. In legal terms, it has a clear definition - genocide. Under Article II of the UN Convention on the

842 7K 13K 1.8M 516

تمام دنیا شاهد اتفاقات ایران است از جمله وسعت کشتارها و اینکه چگونه رژیم ایران منابع عظیمی را برای گسترش جنگ و خشونت در منطقه و جهان سرمایه‌گذاری می‌کند. اوکراین هیچ یک از هزاران پهپاد "شاهد" را که شهرها و روستاهای ما، مردم ما را هدف قرار دادند، فراموش نخواهد کرد. ما شاهدیم که در موضوع ایران، سایر کشورهای اروپایی، یعنی آن دسته از اروپایی‌هایی که خواستار تعامل فعال‌تر و موضع اصولی‌تری بودند، و همچنین خود ایرانی ها، صدای اوکراین را شنیده اند. اتحادیه اروپا در واقع بر سر تصمیمی برای شناختن یکی از سازمان‌های اصلی رژیم ایران، یعنی به اصطلاح سپاه پاسداران انقلاب اسلامی، به عنوان یک سازمان تروریستی به توافق رسیده است. رویه‌های مربوطه اروپایی در حال حاضر در حال انجام است. در اوکراین، ما چنین تصمیمی گرفته‌ایم و این سازمان را به عنوان یک سازمان تروریستی شناخته‌ایم. برای ما، این قضیه تمام شده است. همه تروریست‌های جهان سزاوار برخورد و محکومیت یکسانی هستند - هیچ یک از آنها نباید پیروز شود.

@NicoleRPrause Was it made clear to respondents, particularly in categories 1-4, whether the aggression is meant as "aggression with any gender combination", "some specific gender on gender aggression", or specifically by men on women? The latter case is what commenters here seem to assume.