j @johncraines

Joined January 2015

Tweets

1K
Followers

301
Following

296
Likes

2K

j @johncraines

5 years ago

@dwcongdon It was truly masterful. When you have the time, check out Kurzel's 2015 Macbeth with Fassbender and Cotillard. I've worked with the cinematographer, Arkapaw, and he shot it so incredibly well. Way different than Coen's though to say the least!

0 0 1 0 0

View Details

j @johncraines

5 years ago

@rbnmckenna86 I’m really interested in reading this. Thank you!

0 0 0 0 0

View Details

j @johncraines

5 years ago

@DanKoch @FilipinoBear science. Caused behaviors outside our control are understood through a reconceptualization of the unconscious in combination with prewired neural plasticity and genetic influence. A theologian with a good grasp of cognitive psychology could articulate this very well. 2

1 0 0 0 0

View Details

j @johncraines

5 years ago

@DanKoch @FilipinoBear A problem you’ll run into is that behaviorism is largely rejected by modern psychology, having been replaced in the course of the cognitive revolution. You might have better chances of finding someone arguing in favor of “judge not” as supported by the deliverances of cognitive 1

1 0 0 0 0

View Details

j @johncraines

6 years ago

@sjggraham Oh you'll certainly enjoy it. I have a digital copy I could send you if you'd like to add it to your library immediately.

0 0 0 0 0

View Details

j @johncraines

6 years ago

@cecilymwhiteley @lastpositivist Sometimes it IS thought to be circular. Williamson for example explicitly embraces the safety condition as circular. But others, like Pritchard, do indeed try to formulate the condition in a non-circular way. W's Anti-Luminosity chapter in Knowledge & its Limits is great on this.

0 0 2 0 0

View Details

j @johncraines

6 years ago

@DanKoch I'm oddly enough halfway through The Predicament of Belief right now. Been great.

0 0 3 0 0

View Details

j @johncraines

7 years ago

@margejacobsen Oh Marge, you were always so easy to love. It’s an honor to have shown you kindness, and I sincerely wish the very best for you.

0 0 1 0 0

View Details

j @johncraines

7 years ago

@taddelay Excellent. Really look forward to it.

0 0 0 0 0

View Details

j @johncraines

7 years ago

@taddelay Is this paper written? Where can we read it? Very interesting thesis.

0 0 0 0 0

View Details

j @johncraines

7 years ago

@jph_anderson DO IT

0 0 1 0 0

View Details

j @johncraines

7 years ago

@jph_anderson Sekiro obviously, but Death Stranding shall overtake it. Link's Awakening may even do so.

0 0 0 0 0

View Details

j @johncraines

7 years ago

@DeanDettloff youtube.com/watch?v=3SedEM… You're entirely right. This is currently my favorite cover.

0 0 1 0 0

View Details

j @johncraines

7 years ago

@lllogansays Great work on this thread. Always love some proper syntactic analysis and translational insights. More reasons still why I wish Paul was a more universally recognized intellectual instead being relegated mostly to religious studies.

0 0 1 0 0

View Details

j @johncraines

7 years ago

@ErikMKort Oh no I had finished thank you! We're in perfect agreement as I too was referencing Acts. Modern Christians can misapply this quick transformation to their own leaders, whereas the author of Acts was just compressing time like many authors of his day to get his point across.

0 0 2 0 0

View Details

j @johncraines

7 years ago

@ErikMKort One reason why the change is so dramatic is that there’s decades of transformation compressed into a couple chapters in order to communicate the author’s point. No one should transform like this in 3 days, but neither did Paul. 3

1 0 1 0 0

View Details

j @johncraines

7 years ago

@ErikMKort The Paul at the end of all this, over 20 years after conversion, is the Paul Luke had in mind literarily while writing Acts, itself written 20 years after Paul’s death. 2

1 0 0 0 0

View Details

j @johncraines

7 years ago

@DanKoch @_danielrosado @ReconstructPod Nothing changes. I am more or less in possession of those assumptions. There aren't any cars or driveways without minds. I think we perhaps agree, therefore!