Quizz Fizz 💙 @quizzfizz

“Just because female people exist as a class in law it doesn’t mean that it is right that they do. We should remove female people as a class in law and it is right to do so.” Do you want to hand the country to fascists??? You dangerous fucking idiots.

Labour🌹Unions @labourunionsuk

2 weeks ago

A clear message from our Chair: "Just because something is the law, does not mean it is right. Laws can be wrong. Section 28 was the law, and it was wrong. And you know what the Labour government did? It changed the law. It can be done. It must be done."

540 48 206 249K 26

It’s increasingly clear that whether you’re right-wing or left-wing matters less than something more fundamental: whether you believe reality should shape policy, or reality should be made to bend around ideology. Gender ideology has exposed that divide starkly. On one side are those willing to disregard science, facts and even the evidence of their own eyes in service of an identitarian belief system. On the other are those of us who still think reality has to be the starting point. Among that second group, of course, there will be disagreements - over how to run the economy, how much to spend on public services, what constitutes an acceptable level of immigration. Little things like that. But underneath all of it is the bigger question: reality. How can those of us who believe in common sense vote for politicians who ask us to accept a worldview built on ideological assertions and the demands of vocal minorities? How can those of us who genuinely believe in equality support policies that subordinate women’s sex-based rights to the claims of males who identify as women? How can anyone call it safeguarding to allow biological males into changing rooms used by girls? Or call it compassion to remove the healthy breasts of a teenage girl while telling her she can become a boy? This is the deeper divide. Macroeconomic policy be damned. Before any of that, we have to decide whether politics remains anchored in material reality - or whether we collectively agree to pretend reality is something we can simply redefine.

I find it fascinating that supposed left-wingers are campaigning to put male sex offenders in women’s prisons, trying to shut down women-only rape crisis centres and cheering on Big Pharma’s lucrative move into chemical castration of minors, but here we are.

We have responded to an especially unpleasant letter which was in The National earlier this week. This is our letter: thenational.scot/politics/26573…

@SarahLudford @EdwardJDavey @LibDems Maybe the £225k donation he took to push trans issues? Like the money Stonewall took before him to add T to the LGB. For such a small group trans seem to have a lot of rich backers.

"500 women a year under the age of 25 getting medically unnecessary bilateral mastectomies on the NHS - in the absence of a diagnosis and without any scientific justification - is a scandal." Dr. Louise Irvine (June 2026)

#REPORT: Mark Carney's lawyers in federal court admitted that female inmates in Canadian prisons have been raped by transgender prisoners, but argued that this is a "reasonable limit" on their charter rights to accommodate the "needs of gender diverse inmates."

"Every general secretary who backed this motion, or let it pass without a recorded objection, owes their women members a plain answer to a plain question: do you believe the Equality Act’s protection of sex-based rights for women is a settled matter, or a temporary inconvenience to be campaigned away? There is no third option that respects both groups of members honestly"

The Heartlands Tribune @HeartlandsTrib

3 weeks ago

#TUC Motion 17 commits 5.3 million union members to campaign for gender self-declaration, reversing a Supreme Court ruling on women's sex-based rights. Refuges. Changing rooms. Prisons. Women-only spaces. All at stake. Yet the motion never once uses the word "woman". Ask your

64 410 840 205K 100

'There is a bitter irony in a movement that owes so much of its modern legitimacy to women workers now organising to legislate around their protections without saying so out loud. It was women sewing machinists at Ford’s Dagenham plant who walked out in 1968 over unequal pay and forced the Equal Pay Act through Parliament two years later. It was women cleaners, care workers, dinner ladies and shop staff who built the base of unions like UNISON and USDAW into the mass movements they are today. Nearly half of TUC-affiliated unions are led by women. And yet when it came to a motion that touches directly on whether women can rely on single-sex spaces, services and sport being defined by sex rather than declaration, the platform found room for dignity, humiliation and exclusion, but not for the word describing the class of people the ruling was actually about.'' Well said @PaulKnaggs @HeartlandsTrib Today is an incredibly shameful day for the unions. heartlandstribune.com/tuc-motion-17-… @The_TUC @unisontheunion @unitetheunion @GMB_union @TheBMA @thecsp @MidwivesRCM @SocRadiographers @BDA_Dietitians @PDA_Union @HCSANews @BDADentists

Petition: Require sex specific language in government, NHS, education, and public bodies Every time you quote a tweet, more see this Enough is enough Sign today, and don't forget to check your spam boxes, this should be at 100,000 signatures by now! petition.parliament.uk/petitions/7791…

Now that #TUC2026 has passed Motion 17 to Oppose the EHRC Code of Practice (Services, Public Functions and Associations) women union members may want to know how the motion can be implemented without undermining the rights of women. Some questions here... filia.org.uk/latest-news/20…

@SteveAkehurst @residentadviser I think it’s oppositional to identitarian ideology not left wing politics. Gender ideology is itself also very socially conservative in its approach to gender norms. My feminism is a different ideal of left-wing progress grounded in material reality not quasi-religious ideology.

@LukeTryl A better question would be why so-called progressives are behaving in such an anti-democratic way. Both these campaigns rejected discussion, consensus building and compromise as well as ignoring facts and inconvenient realities.

Both of them fell away on contact with the law and legislature. What else do they have in common? Reliance on emotional blackmail, manipulated/weak evidence, bullying/silencing of opponents, background commercial interests, professional multi-platform lobbying and, last but not least, a complete failure to uphold principles of safe-guarding the vulnerable.

Ps: @labourlewis has blocked me for calling him out. Whatever you do, please don't share the below post. We can't be having a pile-on of this man, now, can we?

Dr P. Accurate sex-recognition is a human right @Psychgirl211

a month ago

This is @labourlewis Mr Lewis has been the MP for Norwich South since 2015. Mr Lewis is "100% proud" to have supported Mika Minio-Paluello, a transvestite man who put his nipples (heavens only knows how many times), into the mouth of a tiny, helpless, baby under the

358 2K 8K 214K 121

Please don’t share this… @MetroUK

There are 315 'Data Centres' queued up to be added to the UK grid. They will use 73GW of electricity. The current average use for the ENTIRE UK is 24GW. They will use 3x more electricity than everyone in the UK combined. And YOU will be paying their heavily subsidised bills.

I lurk in about 400 groups for “trans women”. These are straight men who have a humiliation/feminisation fetish, and the most humiliating role is to be a submissive woman. It’s purely sexual. They start small and eventually “venture out dressed” and post photos and details about it for wanks. They almost always have one very specific pose or place or piece of clothing or gesture or situation that they reenact over and over again. They take thousands of pictures of themselves and share with other men in the groups. The “being seen” part is central. They begin to realise the most degrading thing would be to be bent over and fucked by a man. This is the ultimate submission. And what tends to happen is that this occasional hobby pulls them in, much like a gambling addiction, and they realise they can’t stop. They take risks. They might meet up and fuck each other. The fantasy deepens. They begin to feel bad and don’t understand why they can’t give it up. They purge all their gear but it emerges stronger each time. They keep pushing further and further. Going into more public situations, coming back to the groups to talk about how daring and exciting it was. But they begin to have difficulty reconciling this deep addiction with their regular life and family situation. Eventually, they begin to tell themselves a different story: the reason I’m “like this” is because I’ve always actually been a woman on the inside. I think this is to deal with the shame. They retrofit their past to suit this new telling. They stop purging and binging on clothes. They tell their wives they have always felt this way. They change their profile names and pictures. Meredith. Candy. Amy-Jane. They want their wives to “too” them. Wives won’t comply. They get divorced. They lose everything but they are momentarily euphoric. “This is who I’m meant to be.” But to make it work, every person, new and old, has to pretend along with them. You have to see a woman, not a creep. They don’t like feeling like creeps. So it’s very important everyone complies. One way to try to prove to themselves that they are not creeps is to join women’s groups and clubs. Get approval from the gals. To prove to themselves and to everyone. To their families. To have a story that makes them out to be brave women not perverted men. But people struggle to see the woman they want to be seen as. Every act of non-compliance shatters the growing, increasingly intense delusion. Depression creeps in. They get angry. The stakes are high. They try to erase their old life and start fresh, they clean up their profiles and admonish any trans woman doing thirsty posts in support groups (but sometimes they forget to leave the fetish groups so you can usually track when this change happens). In every group, they are all at different stages: “John” still trying on his wife’s nylons, “Amber” going to Tescos after dark fully “dressed”, “Meredith” high as a kite because the girls at the nightclub complemented his mini skirt in the women’s toilets, “Cindy” logging in after a work picnic ranting about the colleague who won’t comply. It was during lockdown that a lot of these men started dressing at home full-time. Then they ventured out on the empty streets. The rest is history. If you know the background, it’s hard to see them as anything other than disrespectful narcissists. There are autogynephiles who don’t indulge of course - but almost by its nature autogynephilia is a disdain for women - the most worthless people in the world. In a liberal society it’s hard to know what to do about this situation. I would never be abusive or doxx anyone’s kids. But I would make sure never to comply with the delusion, and once this era of forced compliance is over, when we are free to talk about what “trans woman” actually means, I doubt many other people will either. The men will get the message that it’s not worth it. But right now they are being invited by society to indulge in their own destruction.

For anyone working in the VAWG sector, the brilliant charity @whywomen providing free online training by me in September-Equality Act 2010: Legal and Practical Implications for Women's organisations. Introductory level Opened up nationwide wrc.org.uk/Event/ascent-e…

Gender ideology is an illiberal, backwards way of thinking that I make no apologies for opposing. Heres a bit of my explanation as to why.