☣️ SIRIUS DOWNER ☣️ @subcontent

#UghPeople

PROTECT ALL WILDLIFE @Protect_Wldlife

13 hours ago

Before killing an animal for "sport," think twice about it. Doves form lifelong pair bonds until death, meaning they are monogamous. That's where the expression "lovebirds" comes from for couples who seem deeply in love. They are highly social animals and deeply attached to

68 916 2K 22K 68

Bob & Weave

ULTRA🏝️BLAST @ultrakillblast

3 days ago

THE LORD OF THE RINGS (1978, Ralph Bakshi)

18 284 2K 940K 580

Wind-activated kinetic panels create dynamic light patterns on building surfaces

Syd Mead's Neo-Aztecan vision of a cyberpunk BLADE RUNNER future.

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

Staircase in Paris

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

BREAKING: A Ford Regional Maintenance Supervisor just revealed "smart" features coming to all future vehicles... -collecting your data/basing your insurance on it -facial scanning/heart monitoring to detect "impairment" -in-car surveillance (2027) that decides if you are "fit to drive" (make your car inoperable via "kill switch") -if your vehicle determines you are under in the influence it won't start and will notify the authorities to come arrest you -infrared cameras will continually monitor potential impairment including pupil size, etc. (vital signs) -will actively monitor "key words" for wrongthink -tech that detects "road rage" to prevent "erratic driving" -this is just the tip of the iceberg Needless to say this is extremely disturbing information and likely a standard many car companies/the government will push for in the future. I will 100% never drive a car that has ANY of these technologies and will actively destroy/boycott any vehicle/manufacture that employs this technology. There are countless potential problems with this technology as well, imagine if you you have a medical condition (or the "machine algorithms") bug out and you're sent flying off the highway at 85 MPH (or if the CIA/FBI want you gone) this is a gross breach of trust and yet another disgusting attempt at a 24/7 subservience state. People need to know about this before its too late.

BIG TROUBLE IN LITTLE CHINA was released 40 years ago today. It struggled at the box office after opening just weeks behind ALIENS, but years of home video and cable TV gave it a second life, turning John Carpenter’s action-fantasy into cult classics.

John Carpenter on how the studio, audience and critics reacted after watching "Big Trouble in Little China" (1986) & the reason for movie's failure: "Carpenter: I thought about writing a book about my experiences in Hollywood being a director, mainly because I was burned out on making movies. But | didn't do it because | thought, “I’m not ready yet. | don't have enough to say yet. I need to make more films and | don’t want to quit yet.” Interviewer: How did Fox executives react when they saw the movie for the first time? Carpenter: Needless to say, they had a few problems with the movie. They sat down with me and we went through the film. They didn’t like that the white hero was such a buffoon, and that he was being shown up by the Asians. They were afraid the audience wouldn't think this guy was brave, so they asked me to cut out the humor and emphasize his bravery, which was impossible to do. Then we got to the preview stage. The audience that saw it really loved it and laughed, so they wanted me to put the humor back in and go back to what it was—they still hated the movie, though. They didn't want Kurt to play it plenty. They wanted him to be an action hero, a real live action hero, not Jack Burton. They wanted him to be more like Rambo or Stallone. They wanted him to play it straight and it wasn't straight. Interviewer: How was the movie perceived by the audience and the critics? Carpenter: Nobody got it. Like I said earlier, timing was never my thing in terms of when my movies come out. This movie was completely and totally misunderstood. The critics and the public thought it was just bad, and there is nothing | can do about that." ("John Carpenter - The Prince of Darkness", Gilles Boulenger, 2001) P.S: On this day, 40 years ago, "Big Trouble in Little China" (1986) was released in the USA.

Even though Kim and Nacho may have crossed paths, they never had a scene together on Better Call Saul

Also, no. 🤣😒

𝚂𝚎𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚍𝚊𝚛𝚢 𝙿𝚛𝚘𝚝𝚘𝚌𝚘𝚕 @2ndaryProtocol

8 hours ago

☕️ 👍 🛌 👎 🖤

14 9 62 1K 1

interior design inspo >>

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

Did you know that you can live in a loft in Pittsburgh that’s inside the gymnasium in a former 1898 schoolhouse that’s been converted into apartments for only $250,000?

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

🚨 BREAKING NEWS: The Revolt Against the AI Surveillance Grid Has Begun 🚨 People are no longer just complaining online. They're taking direct action! Cutting down, toppling, and destroying FLOCK Safety cameras that have been quietly installed across thousands of towns and cities. This isn't random vandalism. It's pushback against a rapidly expanding system of mass vehicle tracking. What exactly is happening? FLOCK Safety has deployed over 100,000 automated license plate reader (ALPR) cameras in the US alone, operating in 6,000+ communities and used by 5,000+ law enforcement agencies. These cameras don't just catch stolen cars... they scan every vehicle and person that passes: plate, make, model, color, timestamp, skin type, clothing, everything and increasingly video clips with AI analysis. The data goes to central servers. Any police department with a subscription can search the nationwide database... often without a warrant for basic queries. Billions of vehicle and human movements are logged every month. FLOCK and similar "AI security" companies (with the broader ecosystem including advanced data platforms like Palantir) are building exactly what they promised: a real-time, searchable grid of movement. Critics (EFF, ACLU, and growing numbers of cities) point out the risks: - Warrantless tracking of innocent people’s daily lives - Cross-jurisdictional data sharing (including immigration enforcement in some cases) - Potential for abuse, hacking, or mission creep into facial recognition/video search - No broad public consent for this scale of surveillance Some cities are already canceling contracts and removing the cameras (Flagstaff, Dunwoody, Denver, and others). Meanwhile, individuals are taking matters into their own hands. This raises the real questions: 1. Do these systems primarily protect the public… or create a permanent record of where everyone goes? 2. Is it acceptable for private companies to build and control a national movement-tracking database that police can access with minimal oversight? 3. Would you be comfortable knowing every drive you take could be searched by law enforcement agencies hundreds or thousands of miles away? 4. When does "public safety technology" cross into mass surveillance without democratic buy-in? 5. Is physical resistance to unauthorized surveillance cameras justified civil disobedience, or should pushback only happen through city councils and lawsuits? Reply with your honest take, especially if these cameras have shown up in your city or neighborhood. Have you noticed them? What’s the local reaction? Like if this makes you think. Retweet to spread the conversation. The surveillance state didn’t ask for permission to expand this fast. The question is whether we’re going to let it continue unchecked. Let me know what you think, and SHARE THIS so that others may too. And If you're not already following @TrueOnX... What the heck are you doing?! Don't forget to check out the attached thread.

Noah B. Price @TrueOnX

a day ago

🚨 BREAKING NEWS: People are straight-up DESTROYING Flock cameras across the country right now. They’re out at night with power tools, sparks flying, cutting these surveillance poles down like it’s nothing. Is this the start of a real privacy uprising… or just reckless

551 2K 7K 352K 476

Daft Punk’s score for TRON: LEGACY (2010) is one of the greatest film soundtracks of the 21st century. The fusion of electronic music and a full orchestra gives the film a scale and identity unlike anything else.

cinesthetic. @TheCinesthetic

2 days ago

What movie soundtrack has no right to slap as hard as it does?

240 29 182 2.3M 87

Ez

All The Right Movies @ATRightMovies

a day ago

What's your favourite movie logo?

46 19 165 24K 8

Matryoshka dolls

People destroying Flock Cameras 📷 all over the place. 👀