legalloophole @tintsle

@jimmy_esq Much worse is: “counsel please answer the question I asked” or “why are you refusing to answer my question” variations of which occur regularly

0 0 1 72 0

View Details

legalloophole @tintsle

2 years ago

@jimmy_esq Exactly. It sounds more like: “thanks but I was actually asking something a bit different” which is completely normal

1 0 1 86 0

View Details

legalloophole @tintsle

2 years ago

@beau_baumann @msmith750 😂😂😂

0 0 1 34 0

View Details

legalloophole @tintsle

2 years ago

@beau_baumann The alternative that you seem not to consider (and which is not gross) is much simpler: lots of people think he gave a good speech and agree with him.

1 0 2 226 0

View Details

legalloophole @tintsle

2 years ago

@LeahLitman @michlawreview @ProfMMurray @kateashaw1

1 0 3 299 0

View Details

legalloophole @tintsle

2 years ago

@jimmy_esq How can they with THIS Supreme Court!?

0 0 0 78 0

View Details

William Baude @WilliamBaude

2 years ago

Executive Power Scholarship: A Three Level Problem

5 9 70 24K 30

View Details

legalloophole @tintsle

2 years ago

I thought law professors were supposed to leave to go to Threads or the blue sky or whatever it’s called. What happened to that

0 0 3 181 0

View Details

legalloophole @tintsle

2 years ago

Somebody has to say it. Legal academics need to get a grip.

0 0 1 91 0

View Details

legalloophole @tintsle

2 years ago

@beau_baumann (Also technically not the article they’re citing in the fn but that doesn’t really matter)

0 0 0 44 0

View Details

legalloophole @tintsle

2 years ago

@beau_baumann Don’t seem to really be going after his ideas here like they do in the UVA article

1 0 0 77 0

View Details

Somebody has to say it: I have affection for all three authors, and no strong view about the underlying Article II question, but in my view Bamzai and Prakash have raised a serious question about how to understand Mortenson’s work, and it deserves a serious response.

6 6 52 66K 29

View Details

legalloophole @tintsle

2 years ago

Is Jack ok?

Jack Rakove @JRakove

2 years ago

A truly astute comment coming from someone whose speculative attempts to write historically verge between the comic and the absurd, who could never survive peer review of his work, and who teaches at what is probably the most ideological law faculty in the country. Gimme a break!