SlashTechSamurai (Commission's open) @slashtechsam

That's an extremely retarded position on the debate prompt of whether Tyler Robinson is a patsy or not. That wouldn't make someone automatically lose the debate. You would need to still prove that they are a patsy. Andrew not only destroyed her credibility by reviewing that she has no evidence to prove that particular claim. But he also proved that the more likely scenario is what the state has already presented. Saying that he's 75 to 80% sure means that he's leaving room for reasonable doubt, because not all the information is come in. That wouldn't make him an automatic loser of this debate though. That would make him REASONABLE.

@proamericapol He got her to admit, over & over again, that she had no evidence of her claims. In a debate about evidence. Just say you don't like him, call him names & share out of context clips of him, like the rest of the wine moms. Lolll

@proamericapol Except the evidence hasnt been present yet in court. So nobody should be 100% sure either way. Youre the stupid one.

Incorrect, shooters, mobas, and single-player action games, as well as rhythm games are not mechanically difficult. Well single-player action games can be, but that's actually emphasizes my perspective, because they share the same lineage with fighting games. There's nothing about fighting games controls that are unintuitive, all their controls are based off of pressing a single button, combination of buttons, or performing a motion input and then a button. Which several action games as well as adventure games have similar things controls. It comes in with the implementation. You are also making a assumption that taking out something like motion inputs makes the controls better, what it actually does is break the balance of the game, and makes the game worse. There's several video essays that explain the importance of things like motion inputs and how they affect the active gameplay experience and balance of the game. By making everything more casual, or streamlined, you break that delicate balance

In this PS2 Capcom action game, you fight as a demonic swordsman against a black-haired, gun-toting woman in white who zips around on a grappling hook Sometime after, she joins up to assist the main character. Despite their undeniable romantic tension, they don't end up together

I am very distrustful of Disney and their ability to handle franchises or series. Especially ones that have somewhat of a male demographic or lean toward them. Moreover, they have not had a great track record when it comes to writing for TV shows or movies as of late. This is why I am extremely distrustful of Disney even trying to get into the anime sphere. And while I agree this is the correct move since the industry is moving more toward anime, and this is literally Disney's only option to break into that space, I don't have confidence that they will actually write a good show that won't make a mockery of the rest of the franchise.

Nooooooo, this is gonna BADDDD

Disney @Disney

2 days ago

Ready for a new adventure? 💛 An original Kingdom Hearts anime series inspired by the beloved video game franchise is coming soon to @DisneyChannel and @DisneyPlus

2K 32K 114K 6.0M 13K

Just look at the clips from the debate going around by them. All they have is Andrew not saying all 7 charges verbatim as if that is relevant at all to who killed Charlie.

Andrew Wilson @paleochristcon

2 days ago

They had nothing. And never had anything. Done.

8K 2K 27K 1.6M 453

He doesn't push back in order to not bog down the debate. He wants to get her on consecutive points, rather than specifically nailing her down on one thing, because instead of deconstructing a multitude of arguments and points that you makes, if he makes a bunch of her statements look insane and stupid, he really does more damage to her. It's actually a smart tactic because he's paying attention, and knows what the ultimate goal is.

He doesn't push back in order to not bog down the debate. He wants to get her on consecutive points, rather than specifically nailing her down on one thing, because instead of deconstructing a multitude of arguments and points that you makes, if he makes a bunch of her statements look insane and stupid, he really does more damage to her. It's actually a smart tactic because he's paying attention, and knows what the ultimate goal is.

Andrew Won

Rachel Wilson @Rach4Patriarchy

2 days ago

@NickJFuentes @Femcelk2k19 @RealCandaceO

187 63 2K 406K 35

@RazorFist Bookmarking this for later. This debate is going to cause the snowball effect that leads to Candace Owens' downfall you can mark it

@RazorFist I wouldn't say it was pointless. Andrew gave her every chance in the world to present her evidence that Tyler is a patsy. In the end, she had nothing but incredulity. Those of us unwilling to watch all of her videos now understand that she's full of it.

I hate X polls... they matter as much as the followers of the poster and the slop that pushes x posts. Candace Bots... assemble! Just need one person to tell me one part where Candace proved/gave evidence for her claim... just one time

PBD Podcast @PBDsPodcast

2 days ago

Who won?

4K 3K 12K 1.5M 844

Candace fans, do yourselves a favor and don’t watch this clip. 😂 You’ve been warned. Watching it might be devastating. 😭

Candace Owens received $300,000 to debate Andrew Wilson and began running ads during the debate. None of what she’s doing is for Charlie, it’s for her bottom line. Absolutely shameless.

Devastating section

Nathan Livingstone (MilkBarTV) @TheMilkBarTV

2 days ago

🚨Candace Owens COMPLETELY COLLAPSES when Andrew Wilson asks her to provide evidence for her claim that Israel and France were involved in Charlie Kirk’s assassination.

681 888 8K 972K 1K

🚨Candace Owens COMPLETELY COLLAPSES when Andrew Wilson asks her to provide evidence for her claim that Israel and France were involved in Charlie Kirk’s assassination.

I completely blame it on the moderator. Candice was allowed to go off the rails, and Dodge questions, because the moderator was unable to control the conversation. If Andrew actually tried to pin Candice Owens as hard as he does other people in other debates, we wouldn't get past Two or three claims. Allowing her to pivot away from certain points, allowed Andrew to take a more holistic destruction of Candice's credibility. And ultimately that was a far better option to go with

It's crazy to me, because if Candice actually had that receipt, or any proof about the screwdriver, why doesn't she give it to Tyler's defense, wouldn't that blow the case wide open and help prove his innocence? But they've actively said they've used nothing Candice Owens because she has nothing. Tpusa is not worried about the receipt or the screwdriver, because Tyler's own defense isn't worried about those things